Mollyycolllinss's Categories

Mollyycolllinss's Authors

Latest Saves

You've found your way here, likely, through the process of digression and reincarnation (either literal or allegorical).

WTF is going on is the question for the ages--and--it's hotly debate, exactly "WTF is going on".


People with much to lose are sneaking and lying and paralleling the truth. You can learn more here:

https://t.co/DHf9IQLUYW

This was my 1st ever "interview on the internet". The man interviewing me has tragically passed away. Almost two years now probably. How sad.

So it's nearly impossible to discern just WTF is going on. They're tossing around huge military budgets just to manage such things.

I mean, here's a document from 2019, (22 pages), and it's alleging to explain how much is in the budget for 'counterintelligence programs'.

Here's the link, though I've not read it:

https://t.co/Eg10ogQqLg

Of course "counter-intelligence" is just a made up marketing word for "LIES".

So if they're budgeting in the billions, how in the HELL can we ever know WTF is going on?

And that's not the half of it!

AND if you DO figure out a tiny piece of WTF is going on, they'll attack you & troll you.(Using invisible robots of course). & they'll waste your time, & if you're not careful they'll ruin your reputation, especially if you talk of JEWS, which you're likely of course to do.
IMO, the #SAFEAct is better on election security than HR1 bc it wld ban most touchscreen voting machines currently available. HR1 wld allow them as a primary in person system bc vendors call the paper they spit out a ā€œpaper ballot.ā€ Pen & paper is safer #HandMarkedPaperBallots 1/


I have not looked at other aspects of HR1. It addresses more than election security. The #SAFEAct shld be the starting point for election security reform in my opinion. 2/

HR1 requires that all voters have the option to mark their ballots by hand. But it does not specify that, for jurisdictions with in person voting, the hand marked (pen & paper) option must be available for in person voting (vs it only being an option w/ vote by mail). 3/

HR1 may still be a good start. But it does not go nearly far enough on election security. Here are my suggestions for election security. Maybe these could be addressed in a later bill, but we shld keep them on our radar. 4/ https://t.co/mNdHrvwHcN


The key section is 1502. IMO, it shld add the following. ā€œFor jurisdictions that offer in person voting, the option to mark a paper ballot by hand must be offered at the in-person polling location; giving this option only for vote by mail won’t suffice for such jurisdictions.ā€ 5/
Get it now?


The same people who stormed the capitol are the same people who gleefully support police violence against Black and Brown people.

The same people who terrorize churches and synagogues.

The flags I saw at most often at the assault on the capitol?

Trump Flag
BlueLivesMatter Flag
Confederate Flag

This is not a coincidence.

This is literally how it works.

America's racism was leveraged to minimize and dismiss white violence.

The police stood shoulder to shoulder with this mob of violent supremacists up until the moment that they turned on them.

America made police into gods.

Those gods conferred their blessing onto white terrorism, not realizing that fascism is fickle.

White supremacists seduced America into defending their views, making space for them, shielding them from accountability and elevating them into positions of power.

Racism is how the Capitol got stormed.

Anti-Black hatred is the foundation upon which the attack was built.
ā€œHey, CivilWarHumor, have we been here before -- an inauguration beset with assassination plots and insurrection, with doubts raised about the loyalty of law enforcement, troops, and even congresspeople?ā€

Of course! But back then, Winfield Scott was on the case.

/THREAD


Yesterday I posted Scott’s heartwarming quote about ā€œmanuring the hills of Arlingtonā€ with the bodies of anyone who disrupted the counting of electoral votes. Scott, the 74-year-old VIRGINIAN-born Army chief, was one of the few in the build-up to the Civil War who GOT IT.


Scott is oft-derided as old or gout-ridden or gluttonous (hey, he was America’s first true gourmand). But in the waning days of Buchanan’s administration, when dark plots swirled in the halls of the Capitol, Scott stood virtually alone -- and made DAMN SURE Lincoln got sworn in.


The most famous story from this tense time is Scott offering the defense of Washington DC to Robert E. Lee, regarded by his peers as the best in the biz, who turned it down and asked if he could stay on the sidelines. ā€œI have no place in my Army for equivocal men,ā€ Scott replied.


In late December 1860, as federal troops moved into Fort Sumter and passions flared, Buchanan finally forced out his traitorous Sec of War, John B. Floyd. Here’s a thread I did about Floyd recently, cuz WhO CoULd HaVe SeEn ThIs