THREAD: @iampinkywebb speaks to Sinovac Biotech General Manager Helen Yang on #TheSource | LIVE https://t.co/9vB0Rjs8f8

• Senators question gov't deal with China's COVID-19 vaccine, Sinovac
• Palace: Sinovac price not far from ₱650
• Why should Filipinos consider getting it?

Sinovac Biotech on vaccine deal with PH gov't: We are finalizing the term sheet. It's a non-binding understanding between the buyers and sellers.

Sinovac Biotech adds the deal is not yet sealed.
Sinovac Biotech: FDA should approve the vaccine first
Sinovac Biotech says they have already started producing the vaccine in commercial size late last year
Sinovac Biotech on cost of vaccine: Buying the vaccine is only one factor. Logistics and other factors should also be considered.
Sinovac Biotech on cost of vaccine: We gave a very good price for the Philippines
Sinovac Biotech refuses to comment on the cost of its vaccine, but says it's not among the expensive vaccines.

"The pricing is reasonable," General Manager Helen Yang says.
RELATED: Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque said Sinovac's CoronaVac is priced near ₱650 per dose or ₱1300 for the complete two doses https://t.co/QvvMVC3uqf
Sinovac Biotech: Clinical phase 3 trials being conducted in Indonesia, Brazil, Turkey
Sinovac Biotech says the vaccine can protect people from severe cases of infection
Sinovac Biotech: We think efficacy rating will be higher among general population
Sinovac Biotech: Our safety profile is very good. The pain, as reported by our partners in other countries, was felt by around 20% of people when they were injected.
Sinovac Biotech: We're willing to supply additional documents required by FDA for emergency use authorization (EUA)
RELATED: Sinovac applied for EUA on Wednesday, but submitted incomplete documents, FDA Director General Domingo says https://t.co/YD032AGh27
Sinovac Biotech: 8 million doses of our vaccine have been rolled out in China

More from World

MISREPRESENTED CONTEXT

1. I am indeed disgusted with attempts to misrepresent and take out of context what I wrote on my blog yesterday.


2. Those who did that highlighted only one part of paragraph 12 which read: “Muslims have a right to be angry and to kill millions of French people for the massacres of the past.”

3. They stopped there and implied that I am promoting the massacre of the French.

4.If they had read d posting in its entirety & especially the subsequent sentence which read: “But by & large the Muslims hv not applied the “eye for an eye” law. Muslims don’t. The French shouldn’t. Instead the French should teach their people to respect other people’s feelings

5. Because of the spin and out of context presentation by those that picked up my posting, reports were made against me and I am accused of promoting violence etc… on Facebook and Twitter.

You May Also Like

The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.


In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.

In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.

This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.

In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.