Are private investors just a bunch of happy gamblers who should let the “real deal” aka professionals invest for them instead? Idk, maybe, maybe not. Peoples own choice, right? But I have an opinion about how media undervalue private investors.
THREAD: STOP UNDERVALUE THE PRIVATE INVESTORS
The misunderstanding of private investors - primarily known as amateur investors when talked about - done by media and professionals is too much.
Are you ready? Hope you will enjoy this one and bring your voice into the debate👇👇
Are private investors just a bunch of happy gamblers who should let the “real deal” aka professionals invest for them instead? Idk, maybe, maybe not. Peoples own choice, right? But I have an opinion about how media undervalue private investors.
There are many smart persons out there, which have a great skill to hold the same (or more ) knowledge and understanding than professionals.
Why? Because the world has developed so much and the information-level have changed💨
Earlier on you would not get access to accounting; it could be sent by Bloomberg terminal, send by post and even cost money. Now every accounting for every public company is available for free right after disclosure.
Professionals had exclusive access to the board, and even the founders, the professionals had access to industry experts and could connect the dots faster.
Now every interview with the company, blog post by an industry leader or a Q&A with founders is available realtime.
Professionals have a great network (and they really do), which earlier on was an edge. But now the private investors have a great network as well (thank you SoMe!). Look at Twitter, Reddit, Discord, Facebook groups... Crazy scale on crowdsourcing!
@chamath said it great here:
“r/wallstreetbets is now the largest hedge fund in the world.
Excepts it’s completely decentralized and entirely democratic.”
https://t.co/vgzpxrqTmz
r/wallstreetbets is now the largest hedge fund in the world.
— Chamath Palihapitiya (@chamath) January 30, 2021
Excepts it\u2019s completely decentralized and entirely democratic.
I think the HF, banks and PE-people still have a significant advantage in speed and execution (and network)!. But if both parties – private and Professionals – are longterm, I think the edge a lot smaller than many think.
They live with their math-models, they have never been “hustling” on a company, they have never disrupted anything themselves. They have never tried to make a campaign on SoMe, getting funding, setting up a company from the bottom or dealt with a PR-crisis, etc.
The above is more like an entrepreneur, but it not limited to that. A software developer has (hopefully) more knowledge about this sector than an HF-analyst, which measure the sector by “old” financial-reports.
And common for the above is that they probably have a greater network than everybody else (=outsiders) inside their sector. That is an edge.
It is a little bit funny how every professional think they can judge a sector or company better than private. Still, the private can definitely not do a better job at investing than the Professionals. Ironic, right?
I think the media and Professionals undervalued how competent people are out there, how willing people are to share their info and work together. And least: How much information there are available.
More from Trading
We have shared a lot of threads exclusively on Subasish Pani in the past year.
As this year comes to an end, here are the 11 most powerful threads on Subasish Pani exclusively compiled for you all.
Collborated with @AdityaTodmal
1/ Important concepts from Power of Stocks - Subasish
2/ Important concepts with video links of Subasish
3/ The 5 EMA
4/ The Bollinger Band set-
As this year comes to an end, here are the 11 most powerful threads on Subasish Pani exclusively compiled for you all.
Collborated with @AdityaTodmal
1/ Important concepts from Power of Stocks - Subasish
Important Concepts from Power of Stocks\u2014 Subhasish Pani
— Aditya Todmal (@AdityaTodmal) August 12, 2022
7+ years of trading experience in 14 tweets\U0001f9f5
Collaborated with @niki_poojary
2/ Important concepts with video links of Subasish
There are plenty of videos of Subhasish Pani from Power of Stocks.
— Aditya Todmal (@AdityaTodmal) April 17, 2022
You already know those.
Instead, here are 12 concepts from his videos that will make you a better trader\u2013\u2013not worse:\U0001f9f5
Collaborated with @niki_poojary
3/ The 5 EMA
Subasish Pani revealed the most simple, yet successful strategy: 5EMA set up!
— Nikita Poojary (@niki_poojary) July 3, 2022
Here is a thread of 23 video clips on the 5EMA set-up that will save you hundreds of hours and available to you for no cost!
5EMA set-up: \U0001f9f5!
Collaborated with @AdityaTodmal
4/ The Bollinger Band set-
A set up which has a minimum Risk/Reward (R/R) of 1:4
— Nikita Poojary (@niki_poojary) October 2, 2022
This set up can be used for intraday, option selling, option buying, as well as investing.
Maximum profit strategy by Subasish Pani.
Bollinger band set-up: \U0001f9f5!
Collaborated with @AdityaTodmal pic.twitter.com/aEIUVQF2XY
You May Also Like
To people who are under the impression that you can get rich quickly by working on an app, here are the stats for https://t.co/az8F12pf02
📈 ~12000 vistis
☑️ 109 transactions
💰 353€ profit (285 after tax)
I have spent 1.5 months on this app. You can make more $ in 2 days.
🤷♂️
I'm still happy that I launched a paid app bcs it involved extra work:
- backend for processing payments (+ permissions, webhooks, etc)
- integration with payment processor
- UI for license activation in Electron
- machine activation limit
- autoupdates
- mailgun emails
etc.
These things seemed super scary at first. I always thought it was way too much work and something would break. But I'm glad I persisted. So far the only problem I have is that mailgun is not delivering the license keys to certain domains like https://t.co/6Bqn0FUYXo etc. 👌
omg I just realized that me . com is an Apple domain, of course something wouldn't work with these dicks
📈 ~12000 vistis
☑️ 109 transactions
💰 353€ profit (285 after tax)
I have spent 1.5 months on this app. You can make more $ in 2 days.
🤷♂️
I'm still happy that I launched a paid app bcs it involved extra work:
- backend for processing payments (+ permissions, webhooks, etc)
- integration with payment processor
- UI for license activation in Electron
- machine activation limit
- autoupdates
- mailgun emails
etc.
These things seemed super scary at first. I always thought it was way too much work and something would break. But I'm glad I persisted. So far the only problem I have is that mailgun is not delivering the license keys to certain domains like https://t.co/6Bqn0FUYXo etc. 👌
omg I just realized that me . com is an Apple domain, of course something wouldn't work with these dicks
These 10 threads will teach you more than reading 100 books
Five billionaires share their top lessons on startups, life and entrepreneurship (1/10)
10 competitive advantages that will trump talent (2/10)
Some harsh truths you probably don’t want to hear (3/10)
10 significant lies you’re told about the world (4/10)
Five billionaires share their top lessons on startups, life and entrepreneurship (1/10)
I interviewed 5 billionaires this week
— GREG ISENBERG (@gregisenberg) January 23, 2021
I asked them to share their lessons learned on startups, life and entrepreneurship:
Here's what they told me:
10 competitive advantages that will trump talent (2/10)
To outperform, you need serious competitive advantages.
— Sahil Bloom (@SahilBloom) March 20, 2021
But contrary to what you have been told, most of them don't require talent.
10 competitive advantages that you can start developing today:
Some harsh truths you probably don’t want to hear (3/10)
I\u2019ve gotten a lot of bad advice in my career and I see even more of it here on Twitter.
— Nick Huber (@sweatystartup) January 3, 2021
Time for a stiff drink and some truth you probably dont want to hear.
\U0001f447\U0001f447
10 significant lies you’re told about the world (4/10)
THREAD: 10 significant lies you're told about the world.
— Julian Shapiro (@Julian) January 9, 2021
On startups, writing, and your career:
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
