(2/n)
How to build a successful trading mindset?
A thread 🧵
There is a lot of talk about trading mindset or psychology. But what exactly is trading mindset?
#StockMarket #trading
(1/n)
(2/n)
Why?
(3/n)
Because though the problems are similar, what triggers an individual to go down the wrong way or repeat the same mistake is different.
(4/n)
(5/n)
Placing random trades - Many know they are not supposed to trade randomly but wait for the proper setup. But every now and then, random bets are placed.
(6/n)
(7/n)
Start the diet you always wanted to, the workout routine you planned. The confidence you gain from doing it will spread to other aspects of your life incl trading.
(8/n)
Is it coz you are waiting for that one big trade that can change your life or because you are too impatient to make small consistently? If yes, where are those thoughts coming from?
(9/n)
Asking oneself hard hitting questions that are uncomfortable is part of the process.
(10/n)
And it is not impossible. It takes time and a lot of conscious effort but it can be done.
(11/n)
(12/n)
If you liked the contents of this thread, follow @KillerTrader_ for more such content.
Re-tweet and like for a wider reach and to keep me motivated to continue sharing.
#trading
More from Killer Trader 📉📈
Nifty basic volume profile analysis for today:
Yesterday, shared about various types of volume profile analysis and how to prepare for next day. Read here
We had discussed that a "p" shaped profile and close at highs indicates longs are in control of the market.
It also indicates high chances of uptrend continuation next day.
But
(2/n)
How to trade a failure of trend continuation? Yesterday, we saw a "P" shape profile in Nifty and close at highs.
But we failed to continue upmove today.
(3/n)
We opened positive but the opening breakout not sustaining is first cue to understand that bulls are lacking initiative to push prices up further.
(4/n)
For confirmation, one can use orderflow as well to see real time supply demand flowing into the market.
At open today, we saw fresh sellers coming in a bullish opening.
(5/n)
Yesterday, shared about various types of volume profile analysis and how to prepare for next day. Read here
How to analyze Nifty using various types of volume profile:
— Trader Abhishek (@KillerTrader_) September 5, 2022
A thread \U0001f9f5
(1/n)
We had discussed that a "p" shaped profile and close at highs indicates longs are in control of the market.
It also indicates high chances of uptrend continuation next day.
But
(2/n)
How to trade a failure of trend continuation? Yesterday, we saw a "P" shape profile in Nifty and close at highs.
But we failed to continue upmove today.
(3/n)

We opened positive but the opening breakout not sustaining is first cue to understand that bulls are lacking initiative to push prices up further.
(4/n)
For confirmation, one can use orderflow as well to see real time supply demand flowing into the market.
At open today, we saw fresh sellers coming in a bullish opening.
(5/n)

More from Trading guides
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?