For decades, Jeff Bezos shunned ads.

But now, Amazon’s ad business is huge: it’s on a $30B+ annual run rate (more than 2x the combined sales of Twitter, Snap and Pinterest).

Here’s how it happened 🧵

1/ Amazon doesn’t break out its ad business separately in financial filings. However, most analyst believe ads make up the majority of its “Other” revenue segment.

This figure has exploded from $1B in 2015 to a current annual run rate of ~$32B.
2/ In 2009, Bezos said “ads are the price you pay for a crappy product”.

But the business is so lucrative that Amazon’s interface has been swamped with ads:

◻️ First 3-7 search results (left in red)
◻️ Most of the product page (right in blue)
3/ Prior to the rise of ads, Amazon set out to build the ultimate organic customer recommendations engine.

The approach was codified in a famed 2003 research paper: “Amazon Recommendations: Item-to-Item Collaborative Filtering.”
4/ In recent years, Amazon organic recommendations:

◻️"Customers who bought this also bought this"
◻️"Customers who viewed also viewed"

Have been replaced w/ ads:

◻️ "Sponsored products related to"
◻️ "Brands related to this category"
5/ One of the few organic recommendations that still display is the trusty-old "Frequently bought together" feature.

(Of course, increasing the goods in someone's basket is worthwhile for Amazon)
6/ The road to Amazon ads started in 2005.

While Bezos didn’t like ads, he tapped Paul Kotas (who worked w/ him at DE Shaw) to run experiments on AMZN's valuable digital real estate.

The 1st project was banner ads. But it directed users off the platform and the idea was canned.
7/ The real motivation to build an ad business was spurred on by another tech giant: Google.

Amazon was dependent on Google search slots to drive traffic. The company even created a “Google Reliance” metric to track this dependence…which could potentially be existential.
8/ Google, of course, occupies a lucrative part of the buying funnel. It sells ads at the point that someone shows intent for a purchase.

However, Amazon owns the last foot of the transaction funnel: the purchase.

And, today, 60%+ of product searches actually start on Amazon.
9/ Amazon’s transaction data is valuable for 3rd-party merchants, which have grown from 3% of Amazon sales (2000) to ~60% of its $300B+ retail sales (2021).

To stand out, sellers are wiling to pay for sponsored placements (just like brands buying grocery store shelf space)
10/ Amazon sells a number of ad products:

◻️ sponsored products (search)
◻️ sponsored brand
◻️ sponsored display ads
◻️ sponsored posts
◻️ sponsored videos

Ads have grown so much that -- in 2018 -- it passed MSFT to become the 3rd biggest digital advertiser after FB and GOOGL.
11/ While Amazon says that ads are *optional*, getting buried on page 5 of search results is bad for business.

The avg. cost per click (CPC) on Amazon Ads is climbing. And it's not uncommon for merchants (~5m on Amazon) to spend up to 50% of a product on listing fees and ads.
12/ The economics of running a 3rd-party merchant business is trending towards scale.

A number of companies are raising big money to "roll up" Amazon merchants:

◻️ Thrasio ($3.4B raised)
◻️ Perch ($909m)
◻️ Heyday($800m)
◻️ Razor Group ($560m)
◻️Elevate Brands ($373m)
13/ Is Ads already Amazon's most profitable business line?

Using Google's 68% margin for its core business as a comp, Benedict Evans writes:

"Given [Amazon Ads] margin structure and incremental cost base, it's highly likely to be generating similar absolute profits to AWS." 🤯
14/ If you enjoyed that, I write threads breaking down tech and business 1-2x a week.

Def follow @TrungTPhan to catch them in your feed.

Here's a one that might tickle your fancy: https://t.co/B3SWUCF2cd
15/ Also: check out my Saturday email for some laughs, insights and the easiest way to stay on top of my content.
https://t.co/jGZs8brnVR
16/ Sources

BI: https://t.co/jlQcktIFEi

The Information: https://t.co/fKOEJAFEwv

CNBC: https://t.co/HBtXX54cjP

Inc: https://t.co/BzHCfFTvHN

Marketplace Pulse: https://t.co/oDFsn3GVG3
17/ Based on the latest quarterly filings, Amazon's "Other" segment -- mostly ads -- is currently on a $32B annual run rate (+49% YoY).

That's more than 2x the combined sales of Twitter, Snap and Pinterest ($12B).
18/ Here ere is the article from @benedictevans https://t.co/Q9xeimUowL

More from Trung Phan 🇨🇦

The Wall Street Bets due diligence on Wendy’s is gold.

The catalysts are:
◻️ The release of a new summer salad
◻️ The @Wendys Twitter account, which has mastered “meta pragmatic roasting” (which is effective with younger people)
◻️ The fact it literally sells chicken tendies


OP:

Here’s a more fundamentals-driven analysis of Wendy’s

https://t.co/A2k19S9M7J


😂😂😂


Further Wendy’s analysis from @CliffordAsness !!

More from Tech

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.

You May Also Like

क्या आप जानते हैं कि क्या है, पितृ पक्ष में कौवे को खाना देने के पीछे का वैज्ञानिक कारण!

श्राद्ध पक्ष में कौओं का बड़ा ही महत्व है। कहते है कौआ यम का प्रतीक है, यदि आपके हाथों दिया गया भोजन ग्रहण कर ले, तो ऐसा माना जाता है कि पितरों की कृपा आपके ऊपर है और वे आपसे ख़ुश है।


कुछ लोग कहते हैं की व्यक्ति मरकर सबसे पहले कौवे के रूप में जन्म लेता है और उसे खाना खिलाने से वह भोजन पितरों को मिलता है

शायद हम सबने अपने घर के किसी बड़े बुज़ुर्ग, किसी पंडित या ज्योतिषाचार्य से ये सुना होगा। वे अनगिनत किस्से सुनाएंगे, कहेंगे बड़े बुज़ुर्ग कह गए इसीलिए ऐसा करना

शायद ही हमें कोई इसके पीछे का वैज्ञानिक कारण बता सके।

हमारे ऋषि मुनि और पौराणिक काल में रहने वाले लोग मुर्ख नहीं थे! कभी सोचियेगा कौवों को पितृ पक्ष में खिलाई खीर हमारे पूर्वजों तक कैसे पहुंचेगी?

हमारे ऋषि मुनि विद्वान थे, वे जो बात करते या कहते थे उसके पीछे कोई न कोई वैज्ञानिक कारण छुपा होता था।

एक बहुत रोचक तथ्य है पितृ पक्ष, भादो( भाद्रपद) प्रकृति और काक के बीच।

एक बात जो कह सकते कि हम सब ने स्वतः उग आये पीपल या बरगद का पेड़/ पौधा किसी न किसी दीवार, पुरानी

इमारत, पर्वत या अट्टालिकाओं पर ज़रूर देखा होगा। देखा है न?

ज़रा सोचिये पीपल या बरगद की बीज कैसे पहुंचे होंगे वहाँ तक? इनके बीज इतने हल्के भी नहीं होते के हवा उन्हें उड़ाके ले जा सके।