One of the best Guide on Stoploss
Advanced Stop Loss Guide https://t.co/30RcSCw976
— Tradeciety - Rolf \U0001f4b0\U0001f4b5\U0001f4b2\U0001f4c9 (@Tradeciety) July 27, 2021
More from Ŕajaŕšhìța 🎖📈📉
More from Stoploss
Read and follow this.. he has aptly explained about various methods to trail.
2. TRAILING METHODS-
— Trader knight (@Traderknight007) December 24, 2020
1. SWING POINT METHOD-
In this method we use the swing points or the HH- HL OR LH-LL points for placing sl,
In this method we trail our sl when the stock make a Higher low after our entry and keep Trailing the sl till it hits. pic.twitter.com/CqzCkLdWmC
So, I am least worried in these minor dips as manier times it will give you opportunity to add more of your favorite names.
LEARNING \u2b55\ufe0f\u2b55\ufe0f\u2b55\ufe0f
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@nison_steve) April 7, 2021
Balaji Amines -
An explanation of how trailing stop loss works. With every base formation, the stop loss level is moved up thereby locking profits. Stop-loss can be placed via GTT Orders.
Assumption - Trading on a weekly scale pic.twitter.com/hojzClLOhg

This is the reason for retailers stoploss. Check it out \U0001f447 https://t.co/fnHPgzCCVn pic.twitter.com/njvqgM9PI3
— Learn to Trade (@learntotrade365) July 28, 2021
One of the best way that I know is ATR based trailing.
Here is an example https://t.co/BTATx5fyW6
An example of ATR based TSL.
— Professor (@DillikiBiili) April 9, 2021
SL for coming candle is Low of the just completed candle - ATR of previous candle. Chart is self explanatory. https://t.co/D95iv4t5j6 pic.twitter.com/e8BkO2j5rn
You May Also Like
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.

4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x