25k webinar Done in a tweet
A sweet and simple BNF Setup i use
Alligator Setup
Retweet so that everyone can get benefited.
Check Full thread for full strategy.
1. You have to use 2 charts simultaneously , first chart of bank nifty spot 15 min time frame , candle used heikin ashi

Second chart 15 min bnf future normal candle.
2. Indicator used is alligator , in the indicator you have to only use the jaw of indicator.
3. Whenever spot and future candle closes simultaneously below the jaw line , short at the low of the candle which closed below the jawline.
4. Whenever spot and future candle closes simultaneously above the jaw line , buy at the high of the candle which closes above the jawline.
5. Target and Stoploss - Ideal target which i personally take is 100 points.
Stoploss also 100 points.
On trending days you can trail and take 200/300/400 points also.
I have personally made maximum 624 points in bank nifty in a single trade.
6. Precautions - never trade on sideways days.
7. Never trade on gap up or gapdown of more than 100 points .
I have made a detailed video on the same.
Link https://t.co/XMolGUKZPF
Thankyou for reading.

More from Stocklearnings

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?