(2/7)
One of our users submitted a special Scan:
A THREAD(🧵)....(1/7)
Whether you are #Swing, #Positional, or an #Intraday trader, we have Scans for all types of #Trading! https://t.co/7YtBscFcXb
(6/7)
Subscribe to our Premium Plan at a 20% discount using code PREMIUM20! (7/7)
More from StockEdge
StockEdge Presents: Strong RS Stocks With Squeeze Eruption: A Special Combination Scan!
🧵...
This combination scan identifies stocks that are outperforming Benchmark Indices in 1 week as well as 3 months time frame.
It also identities stocks that have consolidated in a narrow range for some time and breaks the zone with a higher trade & delivery quantity.
Some of the scans used in the combination include
-Higher Trade and Delivery Quantity https://t.co/9CiSwEADrF
The second scan used here is Stocks Outperforming Benchmark Index in both 1 week and 3 month: https://t.co/dv9e3KK810
🧵...
This combination scan identifies stocks that are outperforming Benchmark Indices in 1 week as well as 3 months time frame.
It also identities stocks that have consolidated in a narrow range for some time and breaks the zone with a higher trade & delivery quantity.
Some of the scans used in the combination include
-Higher Trade and Delivery Quantity https://t.co/9CiSwEADrF
The second scan used here is Stocks Outperforming Benchmark Index in both 1 week and 3 month: https://t.co/dv9e3KK810
The magic of StockEdge combination scans is that it takes into account the Bullish signs from many aspects!
(🧵): https://t.co/6tUmyhrw47
Stocks with a High Delivery, combined with a Close Within 52 week Zone are signs of strong momentum! https://t.co/arNYJst06d
Relative Strength is a momentum indicator which signifies the ratio of a stock price performance compared to the market average performance:
Both Adaptive Relative Strength(ARS) and Static Relative Strength(SRS) above zero confirms its performance as better than Benchmark indexes!
Want to filter such stocks? Subscribe to StockEdge Premium and get these with a few clicks: https://t.co/5hmmLuqUFI
Use Code PREMIUM20 for 20% OFF!
(🧵): https://t.co/6tUmyhrw47
Stocks with a High Delivery, combined with a Close Within 52 week Zone are signs of strong momentum! https://t.co/arNYJst06d
Relative Strength is a momentum indicator which signifies the ratio of a stock price performance compared to the market average performance:
Both Adaptive Relative Strength(ARS) and Static Relative Strength(SRS) above zero confirms its performance as better than Benchmark indexes!
Want to filter such stocks? Subscribe to StockEdge Premium and get these with a few clicks: https://t.co/5hmmLuqUFI
Use Code PREMIUM20 for 20% OFF!
More from Stockedge
#StockEdge Presents: The Jwala : A Special Combination Scan!
🧵...
This combination scan identifies stocks that are outperforming Benchmark Indices & Sectoral Indices in 1 week as well as 3 months time frame which has given multi-year breakout, with higher trade and delivery quantity.
Some of the scans use in the combination include
Higher Trade and Delivery Quantity: https://t.co/EL5Qei0mnp
The second scan used here is
Stock Outperforming Benchmark Index In Both 1 Week And 3 Month: https://t.co/pcMzVXMbdO
The third scan used here is
Stock Outperforming Sectoral Index In Both 1 Week And 3 Month: https://t.co/ajJ8jIatdo
🧵...
This combination scan identifies stocks that are outperforming Benchmark Indices & Sectoral Indices in 1 week as well as 3 months time frame which has given multi-year breakout, with higher trade and delivery quantity.
Some of the scans use in the combination include
Higher Trade and Delivery Quantity: https://t.co/EL5Qei0mnp
The second scan used here is
Stock Outperforming Benchmark Index In Both 1 Week And 3 Month: https://t.co/pcMzVXMbdO
The third scan used here is
Stock Outperforming Sectoral Index In Both 1 Week And 3 Month: https://t.co/ajJ8jIatdo
You May Also Like
Great article from @AsheSchow. I lived thru the 'Satanic Panic' of the 1980's/early 1990's asking myself "Has eveyrbody lost their GODDAMN MINDS?!"
The 3 big things that made the 1980's/early 1990's surreal for me.
1) Satanic Panic - satanism in the day cares ahhhh!
2) "Repressed memory" syndrome
3) Facilitated Communication [FC]
All 3 led to massive abuse.
"Therapists" -and I use the term to describe these quacks loosely - would hypnotize people & convince they they were 'reliving' past memories of Mom & Dad killing babies in Satanic rituals in the basement while they were growing up.
Other 'therapists' would badger kids until they invented stories about watching alligators eat babies dropped into a lake from a hot air balloon. Kids would deny anything happened for hours until the therapist 'broke through' and 'found' the 'truth'.
FC was a movement that started with the claim severely handicapped individuals were able to 'type' legible sentences & communicate if a 'helper' guided their hands over a keyboard.
For three years I have wanted to write an article on moral panics. I have collected anecdotes and similarities between today\u2019s moral panic and those of the past - particularly the Satanic Panic of the 80s.
— Ashe Schow (@AsheSchow) September 29, 2018
This is my finished product: https://t.co/otcM1uuUDk
The 3 big things that made the 1980's/early 1990's surreal for me.
1) Satanic Panic - satanism in the day cares ahhhh!
2) "Repressed memory" syndrome
3) Facilitated Communication [FC]
All 3 led to massive abuse.
"Therapists" -and I use the term to describe these quacks loosely - would hypnotize people & convince they they were 'reliving' past memories of Mom & Dad killing babies in Satanic rituals in the basement while they were growing up.
Other 'therapists' would badger kids until they invented stories about watching alligators eat babies dropped into a lake from a hot air balloon. Kids would deny anything happened for hours until the therapist 'broke through' and 'found' the 'truth'.
FC was a movement that started with the claim severely handicapped individuals were able to 'type' legible sentences & communicate if a 'helper' guided their hands over a keyboard.
1/OK, data mystery time.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the
chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project
starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".
P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!
https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the
chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project
starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".
P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!
https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?
“We don’t negotiate salaries” is a negotiation tactic.
Always. No, your company is not an exception.
A tactic I don’t appreciate at all because of how unfairly it penalizes low-leverage, junior employees, and those loyal enough not to question it, but that’s negotiation for you after all. Weaponized information asymmetry.
Listen to Aditya
And by the way, you should never be worried that an offer would be withdrawn if you politely negotiate.
I have seen this happen *extremely* rarely, mostly to women, and anyway is a giant red flag. It suggests you probably didn’t want to work there.
You wish there was no negotiating so it would all be more fair? I feel you, but it’s not happening.
Instead, negotiate hard, use your privilege, and then go and share numbers with your underrepresented and underpaid colleagues. […]
Always. No, your company is not an exception.
A tactic I don’t appreciate at all because of how unfairly it penalizes low-leverage, junior employees, and those loyal enough not to question it, but that’s negotiation for you after all. Weaponized information asymmetry.
Listen to Aditya
"we don't negotiate salaries" really means "we'd prefer to negotiate massive signing bonuses and equity grants, but we'll negotiate salary if you REALLY insist" https://t.co/80k7nWAMoK
— Aditya Mukerjee, the Otterrific \U0001f3f3\ufe0f\u200d\U0001f308 (@chimeracoder) December 4, 2018
And by the way, you should never be worried that an offer would be withdrawn if you politely negotiate.
I have seen this happen *extremely* rarely, mostly to women, and anyway is a giant red flag. It suggests you probably didn’t want to work there.
You wish there was no negotiating so it would all be more fair? I feel you, but it’s not happening.
Instead, negotiate hard, use your privilege, and then go and share numbers with your underrepresented and underpaid colleagues. […]