Over 5,000 virtual match tickets sold! Thank you all involved especially the kind supporters of @SpursOfficial 🙌

Time to give our virtual ticket holders a match preview of our team and tactics! Don't tell anybody!

Goalkeeper - Mr. Thomas from No. 25 - Good positioning & never unsighted.
Full-backs - the Jones brothers from No. 23 - Always give the opposition a roasting. Different gravy.
Centre-backs - the Phillips family from No. 29 - Coordinated, good teamwork & never leave any gaps between them.
Left winger - Mr. Speed from No. 11 - Speed by name. Speed by reputation.
Right winger - Mr Nolan at No. 21. Gets up like he’s on a step ladder. Wears gloves though - bit fancy at times.
Central midfield - Mr Cooney from No. 9 - No pushover although slow at getting up and down.
Attacking midfield - Mrs Sutton - Good vision. Makes things happen - even from impossible angles.
Centre forward - Mrs Harkin at No 17. Gets up to about 9ft in the air. Makes sure rest of team maintain their fluids.
Second striker - Banana birthday girl - partial to a slip in the penalty box.
All pictures taken from fans taking a peek at the action at the MTA from their back gardens in our @EmiratesFACup Second Round win against @HWFCOfficial on @btsportfootball! #COYM with https://t.co/3AVFU6xADJ

More from Sport

Over 70 former professional rugby players are preparing for legal action against the sport’s governing bodies according to this report.

The group litigation seems to be in its early stages, but World Rugby & Unions will be starting to get twitchy.

THREAD on the key issues 👇🏼


1) Duty of care

Do the governing bodies (World Rugby, RFU, WRU etc) owe players a duty of care in respect of their health and safety? The answer is almost certainly yes (see for example Watson v BBBoC).

2) Breach of duty

Have the governing bodies breached this duty? This is the first of the major hurdles for any litigation.

The question is essentially whether they acted reasonably in the circumstances.

Did they know about the dangers of concussion and fail to act?

Or should they have done more to discover the dangers of concussion but failed to do so?

The NFL case was based on the fact that the NFL knew of the dangers and covered them up. I’d suggest that’s unlikely here. However, it may be that WR/Unions should have done more sooner.

Much will depend upon the state of medical/scientific understanding of concussion at the relevant times.

For example, in the early 80s it may be that there was no indication that concussion might cause long-term complications but, by the early 2000s, there was.
Thiago Alcantara, a THREAD


https://t.co/JxxXhI1jJd


https://t.co/MS5UpCuN7m


https://t.co/E4CUMbF2aN


https://t.co/b7dYAyANSh

You May Also Like