I’d love to help you move to your dream country-

Let me show you how:

A thread :

Canada

https://t.co/vAE4dOOSrG
Norway

https://t.co/yj6yUsJ4Vx
Finland

https://t.co/cb7lov6XEY
Holland

https://t.co/EVeAKbvrxY
Germany

https://t.co/baQVp2M7sD
Ireland

https://t.co/khixXxctD7
Sweden

https://t.co/n70aSFyo8K
Australia

https://t.co/2IwP6Vehn4
New Zealand

https://t.co/q4CRLbkRlW
France

https://t.co/fpWeZFssWF

More from Society

Brief thread to debunk the repeated claims we hear about transmission not happening 'within school walls', infection in school children being 'a reflection of infection from the community', and 'primary school children less likely to get infected and contribute to transmission'.

I've heard a lot of scientists claim these three - including most recently the chief advisor to the CDC, where the claim that most transmission doesn't happen within the walls of schools. There is strong evidence to rebut this claim. Let's look at


Let's look at the trends of infection in different age groups in England first- as reported by the ONS. Being a random survey of infection in the community, this doesn't suffer from the biases of symptom-based testing, particularly important in children who are often asymptomatic

A few things to note:
1. The infection rates among primary & secondary school children closely follow school openings, closures & levels of attendance. E.g. We see a dip in infections following Oct half-term, followed by a rise after school reopening.


We see steep drops in both primary & secondary school groups after end of term (18th December), but these drops plateau out in primary school children, where attendance has been >20% after re-opening in January (by contrast with 2ndary schools where this is ~5%).

You May Also Like

Still wondering about this 🤔


save as q