It's funny how so many people who claim to worship "democracy" also dismiss nationalism as selfish xenophobia. Democracy is absolutely meaningless without strong national sovereignty. Under globalism, citizens of any given state have little influence over how they are governed.

Nationalism isn't just mindless tribalism. People are correct to insist their government has a responsibility TO THEM that vastly outweighs any imagined responsibility to foreign governments they have absolutely no influence over, or foreign populations.
We've seen that point taken to absurd extremes by the Left during the Trump administration, with whack-job judges ruling that foreigners have rights that EXCEED those of American citizens, including absolute rights to enter the U.S. and influence its government.
And we're frequently told that some international elite "consensus" completely overrides our ability to make individual decisions - or even to petition our own government, or vote for representatives who disagree with whatever "the world" has supposedly decided.
All of that is the absolute negation of "democracy" in any form, including the dangerous mob rule and majoritarianism that the Left selectively advocates. (Notice they always have a list of things nobody gets to vote on anymore, no matter how strong the majority vote would be.)
The key element of any just system of government is RESPONSIBILITY - from citizens to each other, and from government to its citizens. Erasing responsibility leads to injustice, strife, and tyranny. Without nationalism, the government has no responsibility to its citizens.
This is made quite explicit under globalism, which is not shy about attacking sovereignty and declaring various issues are no longer subject to the votes of citizens. The people of any given country have no influence over globalist power, and it feels no responsibility to them.
The globalist fetish for open borders and mass migration is a deliberate attack on national sovereignty with immediate practical consequences. It's a direct assault on the notion that citizens of a country have rights, AND responsibilities, beyond those of non-citizens.
Globalism diminishes the responsibility of hideous regimes for corruption and abuse, providing financial relief and migration safety valves. It's a transmission system for the most irresponsible ideologies. The benefits of advanced society are redistributed without requirements.
The absolute farce of China getting on the U.N. Human Rights commission illustrates this perfectly. China PRACTICES SLAVERY, a total contradiction of core American values. But we have no sovereignty at the U.N., no right to say fascism, slavery, and genocide are unacceptable.
The constructive form of nationalism - rights inextricably linked to responsibility, sovereign nations governed with the consent of sovereign people - is diminished under this globalist system. Instead, the WORST form of nationalism, China's form, is rewarded.
The winning strategy is to have an utterly ruthless, amoral elite corrupting every globalist institution to serve its selfish interests. Give lip service to globalist ideals while ruling as selfish tyrants. Break every "rule" and laugh at the chumps who follow them.
If you want democracy of any sort, you must insist on a sovereign nation whose first duty is always to its own citizens - governing with their consent, honestly protecting their interests, and zealously guarding both the rights and responsibilities of citizenship. /end

More from John Hayward

More from Society

Patriotism is an interesting concept in that it’s excepted to mean something positive to all of us and certainly seen as a morally marketable trait that can fit into any definition you want for it.+


Tolstoy, found it both stupid and immoral. It is stupid because every patriot holds his own country to be the best, which obviously negates all other countries.+

It is immoral because it enjoins us to promote our country’s interests at the expense of all other countries, employing any means, including war. It is thus at odds with the most basic rule of morality, which tells us not to do to others what we would not want them to do to us+

My sincere belief is that patriotism of a personal nature, which does not impede on personal and physical liberties of any other, is not only welcome but perhaps somewhat needed.

But isn’t adherence to a more humane code of life much better than nationalistic patriotism?+

Göring said, “people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”+

You May Also Like

Still wondering about this 🤔


save as q