Nobody is saying that trans-identified humans should not have human rights; what women are objecting to is the fact that trans activism is seeking to eliminate the following sex-based rights and protections that women have.

A thread.

Here is a list of the Human Rights of Women that trans activism is eliminating; it was written by Gallus Mag, who had her blog deleted by Wordpress after she published this.
1. Removing the legal right of women to organise politically against sex-based oppression by males.
2. Removing the legal right of women to assemble outside the presence of men.
3. Removing the legal right of women to educational programs created for women outside the presence of men.
4. Eliminating data collection of sex-based inequalities in areas where females are underrepresented.
5. Elimination of sex-based crime statistics.
6. Eliminating athletic programs and sports competitions for women and girls.
7. Removing the legal right of women to be free from the presence of men in areas of public accommodation where nudity occurs.
8. Elimination of grants, scholarships, board and trustee designations, representative positions, and affirmative programs for women.
9. Removing the legal right of women to create reproductive clinics, rape crisis services, support groups, or any organisations for females.
10. Eliminating media and all public discourse specific to females.
11. Removal of the right of journalists to report the sex, and history, of subjects.
12. Eliminating the legal right of lesbians to congregate publicly.
13. Elimination of lesbian-specific organisations and advocacy groups.
14. Removing the legal right of women to free speech related to sex roles and gender.
15. Elimination of the legal right of women to protection from state-enforced sex-roles (appearance/behaviour/thought).
16. Elimination of the legal right of girls to protection from state-enforced sex-roles in public education.
17. Elimination of the patient right of dependent females to hospital/facility bed assignments separate from males.
18. Elimination of the right of dependent females to prefer female providers for their intimate personal care requirements.
19. Elimination of the human right of female prisoners under state confinement to be housed separately from male prisoners.
20. Unlike any other social justice movement in history, the contemporary push for "Transgender Rights" (***as it is currently being played out***) are unique in that they are based on eliminating the sex-based rights and protections of women and girls.
This is not about individuals who are gender fluid. This is about a co-opted movement. It's about Men's Rights Activists eradicating women's rights.
What does it take to make people understand? This is not about gender fluid folks expressing their gender fluid spirit, it's about men claiming to be women and taking over women's spaces and terrorising them there-in.
This is about men colonising the sacred feminine, pushing fetishism, pushing pornography, pushing sex slavery/prostitution, pushing sex trafficking, manufacturing perpetual children (puberty interruption), sterilising young people (eugenics).
It's about men erasing women from political discourse, eradicating women's rights, and rendering women powerless.

Do you understand now?

More from Society

global health policy in 2020 has centered around NPI's (non-pharmaceutical interventions) like distancing, masks, school closures

these have been sold as a way to stop infection as though this were science.

this was never true and that fact was known and knowable.

let's look.


above is the plot of social restriction and NPI vs total death per million. there is 0 R2. this means that the variables play no role in explaining one another.

we can see this same relationship between NPI and all cause deaths.

this is devastating to the case for NPI.


clearly, correlation is not proof of causality, but a total lack of correlation IS proof that there was no material causality.

barring massive and implausible coincidence, it's essentially impossible to cause something and not correlate to it, especially 51 times.

this would seem to pose some very serious questions for those claiming that lockdowns work, those basing policy upon them, and those claiming this is the side of science.

there is no science here nor any data. this is the febrile imaginings of discredited modelers.

this has been clear and obvious from all over the world since the beginning and had been proven so clearly by may that it's hard to imagine anyone who is actually conversant with the data still believing in these responses.

everyone got the same R

You May Also Like

Ivor Cummins has been wrong (or lying) almost entirely throughout this pandemic and got paid handsomly for it.

He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...


... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:


Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.

Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9


Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."

I wonder why...

Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x


Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.

Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq