The issue of Black families' trust is not only missing from school reopening plans, but also from many school reopening arguments.

But Black families make up more than 1/3 of our school district and many others, so it matters.

It absolutely matters.

Chicago Public Schools is the third-largest school district in the U.S. In the past 20 years, our classrooms have lost more than 5,000 Black educators, which has had a negative impact on many school communities.
Some of the direct causes of this loss are Rahm's 50 school closings, terminations in Black and Brown schools as a result of turnarounds, and annual layoffs targeting high-need schools with predominantly Black student populations.
CPS then failed to replace the Black teachers forced out of the system, and our district remains deeply segregated. So even as the Black workforce declined as Black schools were closed or turned around, educators were then seldom hired by schools outside of Black neighborhoods.
The decline of Black teachers has also been accelerated by CPS' chief policies of the last decade: student based-budgeting (SBB) and School Quality Ratings Policy (SQRP).
Both SBB and SQRP have decimated enrollment as funding and students flowed to better-resourced schools in neighborhoods experiencing increases in population and housing costs.
In 2001, there were about 10 schools where there were no Black teachers, and now, 20 years later, there are more than 60. This isn’t an accident.
We’ve had two decades of policy erase Black teachers at a time, when, due to high poverty, crime, unemployment and the lack of affordable housing, our students and their families needed Black teachers the most.

And this is their own school district doing this. It's inexcusable.
In 2015, @J1Ramann @DrRedeaux @brothajitu and nine other heroes went on a 34-day hunger strike just to save Dyett H.S.

In one of the most resourced cities, in one of the most resourced countries in the world, people starved themselves to save their school. #MakeItMakeSense
It continues...educators and families are still fighting efforts to close schools. Still fighting privatization. Still only four school libraries on the West Side. Black and Brown students are still overrepresented in special ed. We still need sustainable community schools.
So when the mayor and CPS leadership ask for trust, and talk about the role of equity in the need to return to in-person instruction, Black families look at the past 20 years and ask, "Equity for who?" Because their experience has been anything but trusting and equitable.
Equity can't be the argument for returning to in-person instruction, in a pandemic, when a) 80% of families — the majority of them Black and Brown — have chosen remote learning, b) COVID has hit these communities the hardest, and c) CPS has failed them for the past 20 years.
We can't build equity on the backs of Black and Brown students and families in a pandemic.

More from Society

The Nashville Operation - A Battle in the War

A thread exploring the Nashville bombing in the context of the 2020 Digital War (via SolarWinds) against the United States perpetrated by our enemies, likely China, Iran and/or Russia.


SolarWinds Hack

A digital "Pearl Harbor" moment for the United States, whoever was responsible had access to the keys to the kingdom for months during 2020, including sensitive military infrastructure. This is war!

SunGard + SolarWinds

SolarWinds software company is owned by same company that owns SunGard, which essentially provides data center services. A secure place to host internet servers with redundant power and "big pipe" data connections.

https://t.co/U3P3SrrkM1


SunGard Data Center

In Nashville, around the corner from their "big pipe" connection, AT&T. Like any data center, highly secure. Only authorized personnel can enter, and even fewer can access the actual server rooms. Backup generators are available in case of power failure.


If the SunGard hardware was being used to "host" critical command and control software related to SolarWinds, the US powers would be very interested in gaining special access keys that are stored on the hard-drives of specific servers.
Two things can be true at once:
1. There is an issue with hostility some academics have faced on some issues
2. Another academic who himself uses threats of legal action to bully colleagues into silence is not a good faith champion of the free speech cause


I have kept quiet about Matthew's recent outpourings on here but as my estwhile co-author has now seen fit to portray me as an enabler of oppression I think I have a right to reply. So I will.

I consider Matthew to be a colleague and a friend, and we had a longstanding agreement not to engage in disputes on twitter. I disagree with much in the article @UOzkirimli wrote on his research in @openDemocracy but I strongly support his right to express such critical views

I therefore find it outrageous that Matthew saw fit to bully @openDemocracy with legal threats, seeking it seems to stifle criticism of his own work. Such behaviour is simply wrong, and completely inconsistent with an academic commitment to free speech.

I am not embroiling myself in the various other cases Matt lists because, unlike him, I think attention to the detail matters and I don't have time to research each of these cases in detail.

You May Also Like