People get it confused.

Productive conversations are not had by communicating with people who think differently than you.

It's communicating with people who share similar reservoirs of information, yet come to different conclusions that create productive conversation.

(1/12)

I have had many unproductive conversations with people on Twitter, and the primary reason why those conversations are not productive is because they are generating conclusions from a set of narratives and interpretations that I don't share.

It is all about...

(2/12)
...these differences in information.

Even if you have different moral or political values, those can be identified quickly and you can see the reason for the disagreement.

But, when someone is reading publications much different than you and listening to podcasts...

(3/12)
...you don't, then unfortunately the conversation you two will have will be fraught with confusion and misunderstanding.

You will become frustrated with each other, because the facts you use to build an argument are facts unbeknownst to them, and vice-versa.

(4/12)
But if you are speaking to someone who is drawing from the same body of ideas, but somehow comes to a different conclusion - then you have the dialogical jackpot!

I relearn this lesson monthly when communicating with anti-social justice folks.

I am...

(5/12)
...OK with people starting from different moral underpinnings. We are all different.

But communicating with anti-social justice folks can be frustrating because they rarely

(1) read academic literature/listen to folks that support social justice policies or...

(6/12)
(2) get first-person accounts of folks who need or have benefitted from these policies.

Instead, they build an IDW/Quillette/Areo/New Discourses information cocoon, shielding themselves from the actual data needed to judge social justice policy...

(7/12)
..accurately.

Instead, they rely on abstract logic and reasoning that will always be faulty because the premises they use are not grounded in actual fact.

Moreover, they pride themselves in objective "debate" and "discourse" yet...

(8/12)
...this a hollow discourse - nothing more than an echo chamber filled with a narrow cadre of self-referential gurus producing a false sense of accuracy.

I mean really, do they actually believe Harris and Peterson know that much about *everything*, or...

(9/12)
...that Glenn Loury and John Mcwhorter explains all race matters? Do they really believe they should be taking tips from an out of work Math Ph.D. about critical scholarship? Do they check the credentials of writers in Quillete to see if they have experience in the...

(10/12)
...topics they write about?

In these situations, the best one can do is be strategic.

Occasionally I post to get replies from anti-social justice folks. Because they are in an echo chamber, you exhaust the variation in responses fairly quickly. Then...

(11/12)
...you can eventually block them.

However, there are a few folks who, even if I think differently than them, are genuinely good people and it is easy to separate the person from the idea and just enjoy the back and forth.

This is what I have learned and relearned.

(12/12)

More from Society

So, as the #MegaMillions jackpot reaches a record $1.6B and #Powerball reaches $620M, here's my advice about how to spend the money in a way that will truly set you, your children and their kids up for life.

Ready?

Create a private foundation and give it all away. 1/

Let's stipulate first that lottery winners often have a hard time. Being publicly identified makes you a target for "friends" and "family" who want your money, as well as for non-family grifters and con men. 2/

The stress can be damaging, even deadly, and Uncle Sam takes his huge cut. Plus, having a big pool of disposable income can be irresistible to people not accustomed to managing wealth.
https://t.co/fiHsuJyZwz 3/

Meanwhile, the private foundation is as close as we come to Downton Abbey and the landed aristocracy in this country. It's a largely untaxed pot of money that grows significantly over time, and those who control them tend to entrench their own privileges and those of their kin. 4

Here's how it works for a big lotto winner:

1. Win the prize.
2. Announce that you are donating it to the YOUR NAME HERE Family Foundation.
3. Receive massive plaudits in the press. You will be a folk hero for this decision.
4. Appoint only trusted friends/family to board. 5/

You May Also Like

**Thread on Bravery of Sikhs**
(I am forced to do this due to continuous hounding of Sikh Extremists since yesterday)

Rani Jindan Kaur, wife of Maharaja Ranjit Singh had illegitimate relations with Lal Singh (PM of Ranjit Singh). Along with Lal Singh, she attacked Jammu, burnt - https://t.co/EfjAq59AyI


Hindu villages of Jasrota, caused rebellion in Jammu, attacked Kishtwar.

Ancestors of Raja Ranjit Singh, The Sansi Tribe used to give daughters as concubines to Jahangir.


The Ludhiana Political Agency (Later NW Fronties Prov) was formed by less than 4000 British soldiers who advanced from Delhi and reached Ludhiana, receiving submissions of all sikh chiefs along the way. The submission of the troops of Raja of Lahore (Ranjit Singh) at Ambala.

Dabistan a contemporary book on Sikh History tells us that Guru Hargobind broke Naina devi Idol Same source describes Guru Hargobind serving a eunuch
YarKhan. (ref was proudly shared by a sikh on twitter)
Gobind Singh followed Bahadur Shah to Deccan to fight for him.


In Zafarnama, Guru Gobind Singh states that the reason he was in conflict with the Hill Rajas was that while they were worshiping idols, while he was an idol-breaker.

And idiot Hindus place him along Maharana, Prithviraj and Shivaji as saviours of Dharma.