Enter the thread if you dare. ЁЯШИ

WeтАЩre counting down 13 of the best ways to Halloween on Snapchat. First up тАУ matching Lens costumes for you and your pet.

https://t.co/J0Zn7CfM1q

Tis the season to slay some ghouls. Grab some friends and dive in to Zombie Rescue Squad from @PikPokGames. How long can you survive?

https://t.co/FC9dvafUiV
Is it even Halloween if you're not FREAKED OUT? Scare yourself silly with a Dead of Night S1 rewatch.

https://t.co/LtoE7yHgaG
Be careful! Things arenтАЩt always what they seem. Our Lenses start off cute, but are filled with spooky surprises!

https://t.co/xq45JlYeQ7
Craving candy early? Our new stickers were made to satisfy your sweet tooth.
Ready to get your spine tingling? Our new Lenses bring the spookiest scares right to your living room.

https://t.co/HGAAQ2LSev
Full body Lenses have arrived! Try on all seven costumes, just in time for your virtual Halloween hangouts.

https://t.co/0b90afVmnh

More from Social media

So let's check in on "Newsguard," one of the Orwellian groups (e.g., The Atlantic Council) that totally reliable sites like @voxdotcom and @axios use to decide what is "Unreliable" and "fight disinformation."

One example:

OK, so "The Daily Wire" and "
https://t.co/oEa89coNak" are unreliable. Fair enough, maybe they are (I don't use either one of them).

So let's look into one of our new official arbiters of "reliability," Newsguard!

What's their advisory board look like?

https://t.co/5N8op70VE1


OK, so maybe a few names jumped out at you immediately, like, oh I don't know, (Ret.) General Michael Hayden, former Director of the CIA AND former Director of the National Security Agency in the run-up to the Iraq War in 2003! Google him, he's famous!


Newsguard is all about "seeing who's behind each site," (like how Michael Hayden is behind Newsguard?)

All they want to do is fight "misinformation." That's laudable, right?

Also, Newsguard has a "24/7 rapid response SWAT TEAM!!"

So cool!
https://t.co/EDN3UXvBR9


Ok, I'm not a journalist or a former CIA director, so I have no idea what's true or not unless someone tells me, so hey, Columbia Journalism Review - what do you think of Newsguard Advisory Board Member Michael Hayden?

You May Also Like

рдкреНрд░рд╛рдЪреАрди рдХрд╛рд▓ рдореЗрдВ рдЧрд╛рдзрд┐ рдирд╛рдордХ рдПрдХ рд░рд╛рдЬрд╛ рдереЗредрдЙрдирдХреА рд╕рддреНрдпрд╡рддреА рдирд╛рдо рдХреА рдПрдХ рдкреБрддреНрд░реА рдереАредрд░рд╛рдЬрд╛ рдЧрд╛рдзрд┐ рдиреЗ рдЕрдкрдиреА рдкреБрддреНрд░реА рдХрд╛ рд╡рд┐рд╡рд╛рд╣ рдорд╣рд░реНрд╖рд┐ рднреГрдЧреБ рдХреЗ рдкреБрддреНрд░ рд╕реЗ рдХрд░рд╡рд╛ рджрд┐рдпрд╛редрдорд╣рд░реНрд╖рд┐ рднреГрдЧреБ рдЗрд╕ рд╡рд┐рд╡рд╛рд╣ рд╕реЗ рдмрд╣реБрдд рдкреНрд░рд╕рдиреНрди рд╣реБрдП рдФрд░ рдЙрдиреНрд╣реЛрдиреЗ рдЕрдкрдиреА рдкреБрддреНрд░рд╡рдзреБ рдХреЛ рдЖрд╢реАрд░реНрд╡рд╛рдж рджреЗрдХрд░ рдЙрд╕реЗ рдХреЛрдИ рднреА рд╡рд░ рдорд╛рдВрдЧрдиреЗ рдХреЛ рдХрд╣рд╛ред


рд╕рддреНрдпрд╡рддреА рдиреЗ рдорд╣рд░реНрд╖рд┐ рднреГрдЧреБ рд╕реЗ рдЕрдкрдиреЗ рддрдерд╛ рдЕрдкрдиреА рдорд╛рддрд╛ рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рдкреБрддреНрд░ рдХрд╛ рд╡рд░рджрд╛рди рдорд╛рдВрдЧрд╛редрдпреЗ рдЬрд╛рдирдХрд░ рдорд╣рд░реНрд╖рд┐ рднреГрдЧреБ рдиреЗ рдпрдЬреНрдЮ рдХрд┐рдпрд╛ рдФрд░ рддрддреНрдкрд╢реНрдЪрд╛рдд рд╕рддреНрдпрд╡рддреА рдФрд░ рдЙрд╕рдХреА рдорд╛рддрд╛ рдХреЛ рдЕрд▓рдЧ-рдЕрд▓рдЧ рдкреНрд░рдХрд╛рд░ рдХреЗ рджреЛ рдЪрд░реВ (рдпрдЬреНрдЮ рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рдкрдХрд╛рдпрд╛ рд╣реБрдЖ рдЕрдиреНрди) рджрд┐рдП рдФрд░ рдХрд╣рд╛ рдХрд┐ рдЛрддреБ рд╕реНрдирд╛рди рдХреЗ рдмрд╛рдж рддреБрдореНрд╣рд╛рд░реА рдорд╛рддрд╛ рдкреБрддреНрд░ рдХреА рдЗрдЪреНрдЫрд╛ рд▓реЗрдХрд░ рдкреАрдкрд▓ рдХрд╛ рдЖрд▓рд┐рдВрдЧрди...

...рдХрд░реЗрдВ рдФрд░ рддреБрдо рднреА рдкреБрддреНрд░ рдХреА рдЗрдЪреНрдЫрд╛ рд▓реЗрдХрд░ рдЧреВрд▓рд░ рд╡реГрдХреНрд╖ рдХрд╛ рдЖрд▓рд┐рдВрдЧрди рдХрд░рдирд╛ред рдЖрд▓рд┐рдВрдЧрди рдХрд░рдиреЗ рдХреЗ рдмрд╛рдж рдЪрд░реВ рдХрд╛ рд╕реЗрд╡рди рдХрд░рдирд╛, рдЗрд╕рд╕реЗ рддреБрдо рджреЛрдиреЛ рдХреЛ рдкреБрддреНрд░ рдкреНрд░рд╛рдкреНрддрд┐ рд╣реЛрдЧреАредрдкрд░рдВрддреБ рдорд╛рдВ рдмреЗрдЯреА рдХреЗ рдЪрд░реВ рдЖрдкрд╕ рдореЗрдВ рдмрджрд▓ рдЬрд╛рддреЗ рд╣реИрдВ рдФрд░ рдпреЗ рдорд╣рд░реНрд╖рд┐ рднреГрдЧреБ рдЕрдкрдиреА рджрд┐рд╡реНрдп рджреГрд╖реНрдЯрд┐ рд╕реЗ рджреЗрдЦ рд▓реЗрддреЗ рд╣реИрдВред

рднреГрдЧреБ рдЛрд╖рд┐ рд╕рддреНрдпрд╡рддреА рд╕реЗ рдХрд╣рддреЗ рд╣реИрдВ,"рдкреБрддреНрд░реА рддреБрдореНрд╣рд╛рд░рд╛ рдФрд░ рддреБрдореНрд╣рд╛рд░реА рдорд╛рддрд╛ рдиреЗ рдПрдХ рджреБрд╕рд░реЗ рдХреЗ рдЪрд░реВ рдЦрд╛ рд▓рд┐рдП рд╣реИрдВредрдЗрд╕ рдХрд╛рд░рдг рддреБрдореНрд╣рд╛рд░рд╛ рдкреБрддреНрд░ рдмреНрд░рд╛рд╣реНрдордг рд╣реЛрддреЗ рд╣реБрдП рднреА рдХреНрд╖рддреНрд░рд┐рдп рд╕рд╛ рдЖрдЪрд░рдг рдХрд░реЗрдЧрд╛ рдФрд░ рддреБрдореНрд╣рд╛рд░реА рдорд╛рддрд╛ рдХрд╛ рдкреБрддреНрд░ рдХреНрд╖рддреНрд░рд┐рдп рд╣реЛрдХрд░ рднреА рдмреНрд░рд╛рд╣реНрдордг рд╕рд╛ рдЖрдЪрд░рдг рдХрд░реЗрдЧрд╛ред"
рдЗрд╕ рдкрд░ рд╕рддреНрдпрд╡рддреА рдиреЗ рднреГрдЧреБ рдЛрд╖рд┐ рд╕реЗ рдмрдбрд╝реА рд╡рд┐рдирддреА рдХреАред


рд╕рддреНрдпрд╡рддреА рдиреЗ рдХрд╣рд╛,"рдореБрдЭреЗ рдЖрд╢реАрд░реНрд╡рд╛рдж рджреЗрдВ рдХрд┐ рдореЗрд░рд╛ рдкреБрддреНрд░ рдмреНрд░рд╛рд╣реНрдордг рд╕рд╛ рд╣реА рдЖрдЪрд░рдг рдХрд░реЗред"рддрдм рдорд╣рд░реНрд╖рд┐ рдиреЗ рдЙрд╕реЗ рдпреЗ рдЖрд╢реАрд░реНрд╡рд╛рдж рджреЗ рджрд┐рдпрд╛ рдХрд┐ рдЙрд╕рдХрд╛ рдкреБрддреНрд░ рдмреНрд░рд╛рд╣реНрдордг рд╕рд╛ рд╣реА рдЖрдЪрд░рдг рдХрд░реЗрдЧрд╛ рдХрд┐рдиреНрддреБ рдЙрд╕рдХрд╛ рдкреМрддреНрд░ рдХреНрд╖рддреНрд░рд┐рдпреЛрдВ рд╕рд╛ рд╡реНрдпрд╡рд╣рд╛рд░ рдХрд░реЗрдЧрд╛ред рд╕рддреНрдпрд╡рддреА рдХрд╛ рдПрдХ рдкреБрддреНрд░ рд╣реБрдЖ рдЬрд┐рд╕рдХрд╛ рдирд╛рдо рдЬрдореНрджрд╛рдЧреНрдирд┐ рдерд╛ рдЬреЛ рд╕рдкреНрдд рдЛрд╖рд┐рдпреЛрдВ рдореЗрдВ рд╕реЗ рдПрдХ рд╣реИрдВред
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thingтАФphysical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?