25Sma in "15 min. t/f" is same as 75 Sma in "5 min. t/f" which we use as 1 Day average
Earlier chart in 5 Min. t/f with 75Sma
Relate oscillator movement to #priceaction & you'll notice price rise as "corrective" based on the feeble rise compared to indicator's rise except once. https://t.co/Tt1kD3iPlY
Good afternoon master,
— Sunny Singh (@SurendraSinghJi) May 7, 2022
What does sma 5 means with 25 ma as seen in this chart.
How to use it with macd master?
Already following systems that i learned from you.
Want to add another learning from this.
Keep blessings master \U0001f64f
More from Van Ilango (JustNifty)
@MaverickAmit01
His simple mechanical system of MACD multi t/f with 4 Hour setting seems to remove whipsaws & is producing amazing result with #Nifty
Experience speaks - you listen and adopt
Develop patience to wait for such good set up. Now trail your SL once price has gains https://t.co/jC8tcrZ0Cv
His simple mechanical system of MACD multi t/f with 4 Hour setting seems to remove whipsaws & is producing amazing result with #Nifty
Experience speaks - you listen and adopt
Develop patience to wait for such good set up. Now trail your SL once price has gains https://t.co/jC8tcrZ0Cv
Book mark this and revisit every day or every week till you get it right as a trader. Coming from an experienced trader like @MaverickAmit01 , it's priceless.
— Van Ilango (JustNifty) (@JustNifty) July 31, 2021
Wish we had it when we started out.\U0001f64f https://t.co/0NYKqedy9w
More from Screeners
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
