You talk something, Someone picks it and makes it bread & Butter..
Nothing can be better than this..
#Float #Trading
More from VVikas Kumaarr
#DeepakNtr -- Updated Chart. https://t.co/Qsr4CQu7cK
#DeepakNtr - Can this be a Runway Gap and remain unfilled for some time going forward?
— VVikas Kumaarr (@flyingvikas129) July 31, 2021
Only market knows the right Answer.#flyingvikas #technical #nse #trading #Keepitsimple#Cadlestick #Gap #Breakout #BREAKOUTSTOCKS #stokes #trading pic.twitter.com/VFjbwGl0kD
More from Screeners
This scan will give you linear/smooth/non-choppy trends which are great for pullback trades for working people.
#BroTip
#BroTip
If you want to trade only stocks with established trend/momentum, then you can look for stocks which have never(or barely did) closed below a certain MA (say 50MA) in the last say 50 days.
— Manas Arora (@iManasArora) November 8, 2021
There are countless ways to run scans. Just have to get creative. #BroTip
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
