Instead of Simple Moving Averages, I use Weighted Moving Averages. I use the following signals to identify Stage 2-
1) 50 WMA > 100 WMA > 150 WMA > 200 WMA
2) Price is within 25% range of its 52-Week High and above 30% or more from its 52-Week Low.
Just one question , how do u differentiate stage 2 from 1 , apart from volume , what else do u look ?
— Priyanshu (@Priyans48107837) August 6, 2021
More from Ravi Sharma
I read about it in 'Trading for a Loving written by Dr. Alexander Elder.
I highly recommend this book to all the beginners in stock market.
* Trading for a Living
I highly recommend this book to all the beginners in stock market.
Sir, if not wrong you taught MACD -H in your elearn webinar also? From where you have learned it?
— Prakhar (@Indiantrader101) August 23, 2021
* Trading for a Living
Read everything written on Wyckoff, Livermore and written by Wyckoff, Livermore.
You would find the roots of all patterns, especially the trend/momentum following ones in their methods.
Once you get the dynamics of Price/Volume, any good book on chart patterns will do.
You would find the roots of all patterns, especially the trend/momentum following ones in their methods.
Once you get the dynamics of Price/Volume, any good book on chart patterns will do.
Any book in which we can read such patterns and the knowledge you have?
— Krish (@MasculinityMon1) August 13, 2021
More from Screeners
Still having the same view. Will update if there is any change. Falling trendline breakout doesn't work that way in a bear market the way it works in a bull market. Updating your methods according to the market is the key.
#nifty50 https://t.co/64ZktWHQev
#nifty50 https://t.co/64ZktWHQev
This is the maximum upside for now, post that I am looking for an 8-9% fall in index.#nifty50 pic.twitter.com/BcSOiwWuBs
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) June 24, 2022
You May Also Like
Margatha Natarajar murthi - Uthirakosamangai temple near Ramanathapuram,TN
#ArudraDarisanam
Unique Natarajar made of emerlad is abt 6 feet tall.
It is always covered with sandal paste.Only on Thriuvadhirai Star in month Margazhi-Nataraja can be worshipped without sandal paste.
After removing the sandal paste,day long rituals & various abhishekam will be https://t.co/e1Ye8DrNWb day Maragatha Nataraja sannandhi will be closed after anointing the murthi with fresh sandal paste.Maragatha Natarajar is covered with sandal paste throughout the year
as Emerald has scientific property of its molecules getting disturbed when exposed to light/water/sound.This is an ancient Shiva temple considered to be 3000 years old -believed to be where Bhagwan Shiva gave Veda gyaana to Parvati Devi.This temple has some stunning sculptures.
#ArudraDarisanam
Unique Natarajar made of emerlad is abt 6 feet tall.
It is always covered with sandal paste.Only on Thriuvadhirai Star in month Margazhi-Nataraja can be worshipped without sandal paste.
After removing the sandal paste,day long rituals & various abhishekam will be https://t.co/e1Ye8DrNWb day Maragatha Nataraja sannandhi will be closed after anointing the murthi with fresh sandal paste.Maragatha Natarajar is covered with sandal paste throughout the year
as Emerald has scientific property of its molecules getting disturbed when exposed to light/water/sound.This is an ancient Shiva temple considered to be 3000 years old -believed to be where Bhagwan Shiva gave Veda gyaana to Parvati Devi.This temple has some stunning sculptures.
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?