#SRF any similarity in chart pattern!? 🧐 Remember, this was my trigger from list of 3 stocks in watchlist.
Today, don't ask me for new watchlist - I will be mostly 'Watching' 😏 https://t.co/0BeDHtB55r
#SAIL Directionally it is headed to 140/150 levels next over short period of time. SL - todays low pic.twitter.com/1IE4eJn9px
— Dare2Dream (@Dare2Dr10109801) April 13, 2021
More from Dare2Dream
#Graphite Could now be heading to 880 / 900 levels. https://t.co/qO6QzoYrBt
#Metals All in one place#Sail \U0001f680 #TataSteel\U0001f680 #Vedl\U0001f6eb #Jswsteel\U0001f680\U0001f680 #Graphite\U0001f680 #Heg\U0001f680
— Dare2Dream (@Dare2Dr10109801) April 29, 2021
Very shortly I expect #Hindcopper as well, still at the launch pad. #Vedl #Hindalco yet to pick up pace.@caniravkaria https://t.co/eeOxZ7WWvo
More from Sail
Sail:
Views are for educational purpose.
Riding from levels of 47 (Refer old tweet, tagged)
Impulse wave cycle + subs, completed and now waves adjusted.
This major wave 5 will only unfold, once it gives a closing above 153 levels on a weekly basis.
Pic 1 is for investors https://t.co/d4xtiRI45j
Another condition (refer 2nd image) is formation of a pennant (giving a sneak peak for a BO, closing awaited).
This is for short term / positional players
OI data is skewed because of expiry & will be misleading currently.
DYOR for opportunities
Views are for educational purpose.
Riding from levels of 47 (Refer old tweet, tagged)
Impulse wave cycle + subs, completed and now waves adjusted.
This major wave 5 will only unfold, once it gives a closing above 153 levels on a weekly basis.
Pic 1 is for investors https://t.co/d4xtiRI45j
— Vipul Kankaria (@cobbervipul) May 1, 2021
Another condition (refer 2nd image) is formation of a pennant (giving a sneak peak for a BO, closing awaited).
This is for short term / positional players
OI data is skewed because of expiry & will be misleading currently.
DYOR for opportunities
You May Also Like
Took me 5 years to get the best Chartink scanners for Stock Market, but you’ll get it in 5 mminutes here ⏰
Do Share the above tweet 👆
These are going to be very simple yet effective pure price action based scanners, no fancy indicators nothing - hope you liked it.
https://t.co/JU0MJIbpRV
52 Week High
One of the classic scanners very you will get strong stocks to Bet on.
https://t.co/V69th0jwBr
Hourly Breakout
This scanner will give you short term bet breakouts like hourly or 2Hr breakout
Volume shocker
Volume spurt in a stock with massive X times
Do Share the above tweet 👆
These are going to be very simple yet effective pure price action based scanners, no fancy indicators nothing - hope you liked it.
https://t.co/JU0MJIbpRV
52 Week High
One of the classic scanners very you will get strong stocks to Bet on.
https://t.co/V69th0jwBr
Hourly Breakout
This scanner will give you short term bet breakouts like hourly or 2Hr breakout
Volume shocker
Volume spurt in a stock with massive X times
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
