THREAD of MAPS on LS elections :

A thread of my hand-annotated maps based on the last 3 Lok Sabha elections (2009, 2014, 2019). Do take a look! :)

There are a total of 543 constituencies across 28 states and 9 union territories. /1

Map of 2009 LS elections.

INC finished as the single largest party, leading to the UPA-2 government.

(Some colours have been reused for different parties due to lack of available colours. For example, light green is used for DMK in Tamil Nadu, and BJD in Odisha) /2
Map of 2014 LS elections.

BJP captured most of the northern and western states. BJD and TMC swept Odisha and West Bengal respectively. /3
Map of 2019 LS elections.

BJP held onto most of its seats and made further inroads into the eastern and southern states. /4
Interestingly, 157 seats (~30% of all seats) have been held by the same party since 2009. The super-strongholds.

BJP has 95(!) super-strongholds, way ahead of INC which is 2nd highest with 17 super-strongholds. /5
Half of BJP's super-strongholds are in Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Karnataka. INC's are scattered across many states, with a significant number in Kerala.

TMC has 15 super-strongholds in West Bengal and BJD has 10 in Odisha. Remaining 20 seats are scattered across 11 parties. /6
Some are located in unexpected places -
BJP - Darjeeling (WB)
INC - Nalgonda (TS)

Others are a reflection of demographic realities -
AIMIM - Hyderabad (TS)
AIUDF - Dhubri (AS)

IUML
Malappuram (KL)
Ponnani (KL)

INC
Kishanganj (BH)
Maldaha Dakshin (WB)
Baharampur (WB) /7
Map of 2014 LS elections showing held seats, swing seats and alliance transfers compared to 2009.

This election saw major anti-incumbency, and a stunning 319 seats (~60%) swung in it. One seat (Kollam, KL) was transferred by INC to RSP (a UPA alliance partner). /8
Map of 2019 LS elections showing held seats, swing seats and alliance transfers compared to 2014.

This election saw a pro-incumbency wave, so only 173 seats (~32%) swung.

There were 12 alliance transfers, all within NDA. 7 seats in BH, 2 in UP, 1 each in JH, MH and RJ. /9
Map of the 358 held seats in 2019 LS elections.

BJP held a whopping 248 seats, with INC (19) actually holding less seats than TMC (20). /10
Map of the 185 swing seats (including alliance transfers) in the 2019 LS elections.

Among the regional parties, DMK, JDU, YSRCP and BSP made major gains. /11
Map of the 185 swing seats (including alliance transfers) in the 2019 LS elections, in terms of the losing parties.

'Losing party' is defined as the party which won the seat in 2014 and didn't win it in 2019.

ADMK, TMC and TDP suffered major losses. /12
LAST MAP : Seats won by a party in 2019 which were not won by it in the last 2 elections. The voters gave mandate to this party for the first time ever, or after 15 years at least.

BJP won 48 such seats, mostly in West Bengal, Odisha and NE states. /END

Thanks for reading! :)

More from Politics

Funny, before the election I recall lefties muttering the caravan must have been a Trump setup because it made the open borders crowd look so bad. Why would the pro-migrant crowd engineer a crisis that played into Trump's hands? THIS is why. THESE are the "optics" they wanted.


This media manipulation effort was inspired by the success of the "kids in cages" freakout, a 100% Stalinist propaganda drive that required people to forget about Obama putting migrant children in cells. It worked, so now they want pics of Trump "gassing children on the border."

There's a heavy air of Pallywood around the whole thing as well. If the Palestinians can stage huge theatrical performances of victimhood with the willing cooperation of Western media, why shouldn't the migrant caravan organizers expect the same?

It's business as usual for Anarchy, Inc. - the worldwide shredding of national sovereignty to increase the power of transnational organizations and left-wing ideology. Many in the media are true believers. Others just cannot resist the narrative of "change" and "social justice."

The product sold by Anarchy, Inc. is victimhood. It always boils down to the same formula: once the existing order can be painted as oppressors and children as their victims, chaos wins and order loses. Look at the lefties shrieking in unison about "Trump gassing children" today.
My piece in the NY Times today: "the Trump administration is denying applications submitted to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services at a rate 37 percent higher than the Obama administration did in 2016."

Based on this analysis: "Denials for immigration benefits—travel documents, work permits, green cards, worker petitions, etc.—increased 37 percent since FY 2016. On an absolute basis, FY 2018 will see more than about 155,000 more denials than FY 2016."
https://t.co/Bl0naOO0sh


"This increase in denials cannot be credited to an overall rise in applications. In fact, the total number of applications so far this year is 2 percent lower than in 2016. It could be that the higher denial rate is also discouraging some people from applying at all.."

Thanks to @gsiskind for his insightful comments. The increase in denials, he said, is “significant enough to make one think that Congress must have passed legislation changing the requirements. But we know they have not.”

My conclusion:
This idea - that elections should translate into policy - is not wrong at all. But political science can help explain why it's not working this way. There are three main explanations: 1. mandates are constructed, not automatic, 2. party asymmetry, 3. partisan conpetition 1/


First, party/policy mandates from elections are far from self-executing in our system. Work on mandates from Dahl to Ellis and Kirk on the history of the mandate to mine on its role in post-Nixon politics, to Peterson Grossback and Stimson all emphasize that this link is... 2/

Created deliberately and isn't always persuasive. Others have to convinced that the election meant a particular thing for it to work in a legislative context. I theorized in the immediate period of after the 2020 election that this was part of why Repubs signed on to ...3/

Trump's demonstrably false fraud nonsense - it derailed an emerging mandate news cycle. Winners of elections get what they get - institutional control - but can't expect much beyond that unless the perception of an election mandate takes hold. And it didn't. 4/

Let's turn to the legislation element of this. There's just an asymmetry in terms of passing a relief bill. Republicans are presumably less motivated to get some kind of deal passed. Democrats are more likely to want to do *something.* 5/

You May Also Like