Price Action Explained In Steps.
++++++++++++++++++++
1. Navin Flourine & BEML : Consolidation In Tight Range
2. Whirlpool : Double Bottom After Down Trend.
3. Zensar Technologies : Cup & Handle
STOCKS AT ATTRACTIVE LEVELS.
More from PriceNpedia
More from Navinflourine
NAVINFLUOR
Double Top Buy triggered above 3704.66 daily close on 3% Box Size chart. https://t.co/b5KkTmtjl5
Double Top Buy triggered above 3704.66 daily close on 3% Box Size chart. https://t.co/b5KkTmtjl5
NAVINFLUOR
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) March 2, 2021
Double Top Buy above 2839.32 daily close on 3% Box Size Chart and Double Top Buy active on 1% Box size chart. https://t.co/HiLu17wobZ pic.twitter.com/6JIStAhaSO
#NavinFluorine Looks headed to 4100 / 4200 levels next https://t.co/z5sc88chFt
#NavinFluorine A breakout above 3566, this one could head next to 4100/4200 levels. Long term levels have shared already. #Dare2DRM https://t.co/FvexrxG0T8 pic.twitter.com/DHYAiEZ1j9
— Dare2Dream (@Dare2Dr10109801) May 1, 2021
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x