1st grade mathematics work sheets and my mother's mathematics teaching style. Mathematics will not be so terrible, since it seems that parents are interested in preparing their little ones for mathematics before school age.

I grew up without understanding how people talk about mathematics as difficult as they do, it was my best topic at school.

More from Arthouse-Kuklite

Arthouse-Kuklite
@Miltantvibes

These days, a lot of teachers is expected.

They have larger class sizes, the number of subjects is increasing, the curriculum for these subjects is increasing, and they have to deal with multi-level classes where students are at different levels of knowledge and capacity.

Arthouse-Kuklite
@Miltantvibes

The resolution of mathematics problems is easier when you have the right resources. But what are the right resources? The answer depends on who you are, what you are trying to achieve, and why.

Are you looking for specific information that will be used once; Or exhaustive understanding, in depth that you will use in the future?

Arthouse-Kuklite
@Miltantvibes

The training years of children aged 4 to 6 are a crucial point of a child's development. This stage is when the value of a child is formed, as well as her moral and the basis of the child's character is beginning to be developed.

This stage is crucial because the child's brain compares with a sponge in which the child, who is too anxious to explore and discover the world, will absorb almost anything and everything that is exposed.

Arthouse-Kuklite
@Miltantvibes

If you are a parent who wonders why you are not seeing Easter educational activities that you return home with your child, you are not alone.

When school systems go to spring, particularly after a long snowy winter, they tend to ignore Easter and enough stinks to spring topics. Teachers are feeling the crisis and will affirm that they do not have time to create Easter thematic activities.

Arthouse-Kuklite
@Miltantvibes

The key to teaching division to young students who have only been introduced recently to more complicated mathematics forms is to make the student feel involved with the process, while finding it pleasant at the same time.

Mathematics worksheets are effective, but there are other ways in which mathematics can effectively teach. This is practically the generic form of teaching that demonstrates being more effective among children and young people.

No matter how many times make the child complete a division worksheet, or produces division assignments, there is no promise that this child can deliver continuously with the ability to perform successful division problems.

More from Maths

T. Benjamin
@1FreeInhabitant

Common Core math was the pinnacle of their evil genius, and low-point of our complacency... It disrupted the minds of an entire generation on how even the most basic things work.

Readin', Writin', & Rithmatic

How far did they get? Let's see.

1895 8th Grade Final Exam, Kansas:

Handwaving Freakoutery
@Freakoutery

The main problem with "Lift All Voices" as a justification for the Black National Anthem is the word "All." In order to achieve "All," the Woke are going to have to cook up more different unique national anthems than they have gender pronouns.

Mathematically speaking.

1/

And why would the Black community be the first to get their own anthem over the American Indians? The Indians used to have all the land, and they still do have some of it.

(use of "American Indian" here is intentional, as that's what they prefer to call themselves)

2/

This "inclusion by division" game is just the "separate but equal" logic for 1950s segregation reskinned, but when the Woke self segregate, they self segregate based on Krenshaw's Intersectional Matrix of Oppression, which in Theory is necessarily near infinite in size.

3/

When the Woke did this with gender pronouns we went from 2 genders to 37 genders to infinite genders in the span of about 5 years, but the trans folks discovered this really didn't help them out on Tinder, so they pivoted back to "trans women are women" to try and get dates.

4/

The only people left doing the "gender pronouns" game are the ones signaling their Wokeness on Twitter to their in-group, the trans women in the dating community aren't even doing it anymore. They've gone back to 2.

5/

Jonathan Beardsley
@JBeardsleyMath

In light of my tweet thread about the category of finite sets and commutative monoids (https://t.co/jnY0wZZbxq), I thought I might try to say what the analogue is for braided monoidal things (although much of this is still somewhat hypothetical).

So okay, here's a thread on the category of finite sets and a way in which it controls algebraic structure in symmetric monoidal categories. I think it's some really pretty stuff.
— Jonathan Beardsley (@JBeardsleyMath) December 6, 2020

It's also just kind of a cool combinatorial structure! I've been talking to @CreeepyJoe about this lately, as well as @grassmannian.

The first thing you have to know is that, in a braided monoidal category you can still have commutative monoids. Since a braided monoidal category C has a "twist" map for every object β(x):x⊗x→x⊗x, if x is a monoid you can ask for the following diagram to commute:

Remember that being symmetric monoidal just means that if you take the twist map above and do it twice, you get the identity map, but braided monoidal doesn't mean that. But it's okay! You can still define commutative monoids here.

But so anyway, we can talk about commutative monoids in braided monoidal categories.

Gro-Tsen
@gro_tsen

OK, I may be guilty of a DoS attack attempt on mathematicians' brains here, so lest anyone waste too much precious brain time decoding this deliberately cryptic statement, let me do it for you. •1/15

\u2200x.\u2200y.((\u2200z.((z\u2208x) \u21d2 ((\u2200t.((t\u2208x) \u21d2 (t\u2208z) \u21d2 (t\u2208y)))) \u21d2 (z\u2208y))) \u21d2 (\u2200z.((z\u2208x) \u21d2 (z\u2208y))))
— Gro-Tsen (@gro_tsen) February 12, 2021

First, as some asked, it is to be parenthesized as: “∀x.∀y.((∀z.((z∈x) ⇒ (((∀t.((t∈x) ⇒ ((t∈z) ⇒ (t∈y))))) ⇒ (z∈y)))) ⇒ (∀z.((z∈x) ⇒ (z∈y))))” (the convention is that ‘⇒’ is right-associative: “P⇒Q⇒R” means “P⇒(Q⇒R)”), but this doesn't clarify much. •2/15

Maybe we can make it a tad less abstruse by using guarded quantifiers (“∀u∈x.(…)” stands for “∀u.((u∈x)⇒(…))”): it is then “∀x.∀y.((∀z∈x.(((∀t∈x.((t∈z) ⇒ (t∈y)))) ⇒ (z∈y))) ⇒ (∀z∈x.(z∈y)))”. •3/15

Maybe a tad clearer again by writing “P(u)” for “u∈y” and leaving out the quantifier on y, viꝫ: “∀x.((∀z∈x.(((∀t∈x.((t∈z) ⇒ P(t)))) ⇒ P(z))) ⇒ (∀z∈x.P(z)))” [✯]. Now it appears as an induction principle: namely, … •4/15

… “in order to prove P(z) for all z∈x, we can assume, when proving P(z), that P(t) is already known for all t∈z∩x” (n.b.: “(∀z.(Q(z)⇒P(z)))⇒(∀z.P(z))” can be read “in order to prove P(z) for all z, we can assume Q(z) known when proving P(z)”). •5/15