"They'd ruin everybody's life until they ran the whole system off a cliff."
When I was a kid, I played Deus Ex. I was about 17 years old at the time.
I was able to understand that DX was a cartoon version of its subject matter. But it nonetheless captured my imagination, asking
"What if the entire planet could be managed by mere mortals?"
"They'd ruin everybody's life until they ran the whole system off a cliff."
It was appealing. To imagine at least that someone was in a driver's seat.
Somewhere.
There are, literally, clubs. The Ivy League buys little hangouts in different major cities, so alums can efficiently transact that lucrative network. There's douchier, nouveau riche versions of the same. Cliques, associations, name it.
In practice, there's no global board of directors. The system isn't that tidy. It's all the chaotic grasping of people desperate to keep themselves safe, and therefore powerful.
The alignment of the elites is emergent.
They don't need to meet.
They don't need cloak and dagger coordination, though surely alliances form and shatter over time.
They just want all the same, basic things.
The world works as it does because of this simple fact.
Even the wealthy people who disagree don't fundamentally want to demolish the system over those disagreements because that would risk their comfort and safety
Money, power, they're the same substance in different states, like ice and water:
Ability to survive.
That is the circuitry that has been honed on a timescale so vast that it will make your head cave in. It's mundane to us because we all have a version of the code.
When guys are keeping so much money for themselves at the pointless expense of the workers who keep the machine running, that's illness.
Wealth collides with automation to gobble up resources and redirect them out of the larger system for narrow, dubious benefit.
All these brains, all this basic human attachment to justice and fairness—you need stories to manage, to justify, the inequality.
So nothing needs to change.
You need hate to justify excluding people from their fair share of the resources. So you decide they don't deserve it. Come up with reasons their judgment and values created their poverty and powerlessness.
So they fucking HATE AOC because she won't play ball. She's sitting there, unapologetic, demanding a fair share for people like her.
https://t.co/eiV5P6LmVg
Some of these folks just really hate her so much. It\u2019s not even a stretch, the conclusion of this chain. And that tweet drips with disdain. pic.twitter.com/sZ7qnLgFA9
— Karla Monterroso (@karlitaliliana) December 19, 2020
Because if these women, none of whom are white, are correct about how we've shared the wealth in this country...
That's it. The status quo has been illegitimate forever.
More from Life
1/ Here’s a list of conversational frameworks I’ve picked up that have been helpful.
Please add your own.
2/ The Magic Question: "What would need to be true for you
3/ On evaluating where someone’s head is at regarding a topic they are being wishy-washy about or delaying.
“Gun to the head—what would you decide now?”
“Fast forward 6 months after your sabbatical--how would you decide: what criteria is most important to you?”
4/ Other Q’s re: decisions:
“Putting aside a list of pros/cons, what’s the *one* reason you’re doing this?” “Why is that the most important reason?”
“What’s end-game here?”
“What does success look like in a world where you pick that path?”
5/ When listening, after empathizing, and wanting to help them make their own decisions without imposing your world view:
“What would the best version of yourself do”?
Please add your own.
2/ The Magic Question: "What would need to be true for you
1/\u201cWhat would need to be true for you to\u2026.X\u201d
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) December 4, 2018
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody: https://t.co/Yo6jHbSit9
3/ On evaluating where someone’s head is at regarding a topic they are being wishy-washy about or delaying.
“Gun to the head—what would you decide now?”
“Fast forward 6 months after your sabbatical--how would you decide: what criteria is most important to you?”
4/ Other Q’s re: decisions:
“Putting aside a list of pros/cons, what’s the *one* reason you’re doing this?” “Why is that the most important reason?”
“What’s end-game here?”
“What does success look like in a world where you pick that path?”
5/ When listening, after empathizing, and wanting to help them make their own decisions without imposing your world view:
“What would the best version of yourself do”?