I've talked about how governments are doubling down as denial that they might have been scammed. Let's talk about how individual persons react.

The constant panic mindset of these people may be chalked up to virtue signalling, but it's also an indication of implicit denial of the idea that their measures have little to no effect
This is the sunk cost effect to being scammed, and so we see the wider acceptance of this virus being more deadly than the alternative of NPI's having minimal effect
Think of it this way, you spent a lot of money on masks, followed every rule to your detriment, and you have nothing to show for it e.g., your neighbor not following measures hasn't died yet
You can cut your losses and be more proportional with your behavior, but tons of factors make justifying measures in the form of exaggerating virus damages a better option
The first of this is stigma, if at any point you oppose the measures you will be called a murderer. The strength of this accusation is enough for many to tow the line
Second is fear that the misfortune of infection will happen by not following. Every time someone doesn't comply and gets infected is amplifies to send the message: retribution comes to he who dares oppose the virus
I can list many more, but an overlooked aspect is really the sunk cost fallacy. If you read carefully to lockdowner points they assume measures ought to have an effect even if it's not empirically shown to be so
That is, it's impossible for measures not to be effecacious simply on the flawed assumption that the alternative is way worse: If we didn't do this we'd see more deaths so the measures do something
Like a gambler unable to stop himself, lockdowners will continue to follow rules however irrational on the basis that they will be spared from the virus
And thus the sight of anyone opposing measures breaks their illusion of safety, they cannot let anything show that they have been scammed
In conclusion, people who have been convinced of the deadliness of the virus will continue in this mindset as justification of all the resources they put into what they perceive as safety
Sorry for the messy train of thought, it's hard to find the right words

More from Life

You May Also Like

**Thread on Bravery of Sikhs**
(I am forced to do this due to continuous hounding of Sikh Extremists since yesterday)

Rani Jindan Kaur, wife of Maharaja Ranjit Singh had illegitimate relations with Lal Singh (PM of Ranjit Singh). Along with Lal Singh, she attacked Jammu, burnt - https://t.co/EfjAq59AyI


Hindu villages of Jasrota, caused rebellion in Jammu, attacked Kishtwar.

Ancestors of Raja Ranjit Singh, The Sansi Tribe used to give daughters as concubines to Jahangir.


The Ludhiana Political Agency (Later NW Fronties Prov) was formed by less than 4000 British soldiers who advanced from Delhi and reached Ludhiana, receiving submissions of all sikh chiefs along the way. The submission of the troops of Raja of Lahore (Ranjit Singh) at Ambala.

Dabistan a contemporary book on Sikh History tells us that Guru Hargobind broke Naina devi Idol Same source describes Guru Hargobind serving a eunuch
YarKhan. (ref was proudly shared by a sikh on twitter)
Gobind Singh followed Bahadur Shah to Deccan to fight for him.


In Zafarnama, Guru Gobind Singh states that the reason he was in conflict with the Hill Rajas was that while they were worshiping idols, while he was an idol-breaker.

And idiot Hindus place him along Maharana, Prithviraj and Shivaji as saviours of Dharma.