When you have deep relationship problems with a woman, you fix it by love bombing her not through honest dialogue, because hurt women are selfish. They don't give a fuck about the pain they caused (hers matters more), and they don't want to hear an analysis of how they fucked up.
Women have no sense of honour in thinking "I've hurt this man, I need to make sure he will be alright"
No. She will absorbed in her own pain, you will not even be a consideration.
And you causing her additional stress by being mad at her and seeking answers only pushes her further away.
She will never meet your needs and right her wrongs.
See why they're beneath us now?
Basically, it's all on you. Completely and utterly. Women are nowhere near as good at fixing things as they are at breaking them.
In reality, it leads nowhere.
Try it, and watch an argument unfold.
You can never get your justice from them for the wrongs they've caused you.
So forgiveness is down to you.
Can you forgive her?
You make her feel like she is the most special girl in the world, despite everything that happened. That it was a mistake. That you miss her.
She will eat this up.
Not because any real actual underlying problems were solved, but because she feels more positively about you now.
When you kept trying to solve the real actual problems, you just made her feel worse, so she avoided you.
Women are selfish and shit at handling stress. It sucks.
Your woman will hurt you, this will damage you, you will seek justice and closure in your anger against her, and she will deny you this because she's too overwhelmed by negative emotion to accept, and act upon the truth.
This is why women never give you justice. Ever. Whatever they fuck up, they do not fix.
She hurt you? You have to fix it. Yeah, it sucks. But she won't.
If you can forgive her, she's worth love bombing.
You accepted her limitations and fucked nature, and love her enough regardless to work around it.
You can "fix things" by making her feel good by making her feel loved.
You will always want justice, and you will never get it. Whenever you get mad, your resentment will bubble up and cause more and more frequent arguments. You will be unhappy together.
A relationship cannot survive resentment.
For the source of that resentment to give you closure for it, apologise and take active measures going forward to counteract whatever it is that upsets you so much
Or for you to accept what happened and forgive who wronged you
And if you can forgive, the most effective way to reconcile is to love bomb.
Being understood? Justice? Forget it. She isn't capable.
Make her feel good, enjoy each other & let the bullshit fade away
Until next time
She is instinctually compelled to preserve a positive self-image, undermining that in anyway makes her defensive or avoidant, even if you're simply stating things she actually said and did and how those things were damaging.
So avoid focusing on the truth and getting justice, and instead prioritise the outcome you seek. If you want to stay with her, subdue your own negative emotions through forgiveness, meditation etc and feed her positive emotions to rekindle the romance.
If you want to win, and I assume winning means having an enjoyable romance with them, you have to accept their limitations and manipulate them.
Remember, in good times, even if there is a meeting of the minds between you both, that she will be nowhere to be found in bad times.
This is their nature. Even the best of them.
I'd like to think women are more able to fulfil us as men, and do and treat and be better for us, and to us.
But this is not the reality.
We are their caretakers, they aren't ours.
More from Life
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
Facebook originally a CIA program called "LifeLog".
LifeLog, via DARPA, terminated on Feb 4th, 2004.
Facebook was launched on Feb 4th, 2004.
Many of the LifeLog team became execs at FB.
Zuckerberg is a figurehead.
CIA allowed Cambridge to help Trump win
https://t.co/enzOXDCogV
Pentagon Kills LifeLog
LifeLog, via DARPA, terminated on Feb 4th, 2004.
Facebook was launched on Feb 4th, 2004.
Many of the LifeLog team became execs at FB.
Zuckerberg is a figurehead.
CIA allowed Cambridge to help Trump win
https://t.co/enzOXDCogV
Project: Lifelog
— Robert Horan (@Robby12692) December 13, 2018
Started by DARPA in 1999, the goal of Lifelog was to create a database on civilians without their knowledge, and track everything they do.
The project "ended" on Feb 4th, 2004.
Facebook began the exact same day.
The CIA funneled tens of millions into Facebook. pic.twitter.com/r7hwF0v9kh
Pentagon Kills LifeLog