The definition I'll go with is that it's the actions people take to advance the things they care about in the workplace.
Do you struggle with "office politics," like when Colleague got a promotion because they seem to have the same hobbies as the boss?
Do you have no idea how to play the game?
Do you recoil at the very word?
Then this thread is for you 👇
The definition I'll go with is that it's the actions people take to advance the things they care about in the workplace.
1) The company hitting its goals
2) The success of one's projects and initiatives
3) A promotion
4) A plum assignment or leadership role
4) A change in workplace culture, values or process
5) The advancement of a colleague / group of people
6) Personal reputation
Office politics has a negative connotation but is simply another manifestation of humans being complicated and having multiple, sometimes conflicting desires.
1) there is clear hierarchy + power dynamic (ceos, managers, etc)
2) how we perform at work impacts our self-esteem, identity, and ability to sustain ourselves
3) we spend 1/3+ of our waking hours in our workplace
For example, both of us are angling for one leadership role, or there's a fixed budget and I'm hoping my project gets more, which means yours gets less.
Someone (usually a sr manager) has to make a call.
1) I'm disappointed but accepting of the decision
2) I'm upset bc the decision-maker was unqualified
3) I'm irate bc the criteria was wrong/unfair
1) Ensure that you know how your manager + their managers define success. Ask in 1:1s if this is not clear.
2) Make sure your manager understands how *you* define success.
3) ...
4) Continually hone your communication skills. It is a key advantage.
5) ...
6) Ask yourself: did the decision-maker intend to do what they thought was best for the org?
7) If 6 is yes, ask yourself: do I trust the decision-maker's abilities and their values?
Otherwise, make sure your perspective has been heard, and trust in the process. Don't take the decision personally. Disagreement isn't a bad thing; we all learn from it.
1) Walk the walk + talk the talk in putting the company's goals above your personal goals
2) Create transparency around the process ahead of a decision. Eg what is the criteria for promotion?
3)..
More from Life
Okay hope everyone having a lovely weekend. Lots of love today. Feeling very blessed 🥰 Going through NNOX tweets from last week. Time to compile threads and bring you highlights. No need to go digging old tweets if I do for you 🤗 FDA, Secondary, and 3P510k. Let’s review..
The NNOX news flow been exceptionally good. I tweet about Fear Uncertainty Doubt and how short sellers leverage friction in news flow to mine some of your gains. NNOX published Form F-1/A to remove friction. Investors have answers.
Form F-1/A Link:
Form F-1 is over 200 detailed pages. Very concentrated. Everything you need for rest of this month in the document. A few notes for you. NNOX FDA approval uses a third party review organization in 510k process. This is abbreviated to 3P510k.
I covered the 3P510K in thread here: https://t.co/w7zE882CVk
Reference to Eagle eyes: https://t.co/gT779MFX82
We discover in F-1 that 3P510K recommended clearance of Nanox Source. This triggers a 30 day timeline to approval by FDA. However ...
Look at you favorite broker news for NNOX. I look at 3 different broker none of them comment NNOX from 60 to 80 on news that 3P510k recommended FDA approve NNOX device. NNOX get a letter and slide 10% we get headline. But no headline for big pop 🤷♂️ that’s the friction.
The NNOX news flow been exceptionally good. I tweet about Fear Uncertainty Doubt and how short sellers leverage friction in news flow to mine some of your gains. NNOX published Form F-1/A to remove friction. Investors have answers.
Form F-1/A Link:
Form F-1 is over 200 detailed pages. Very concentrated. Everything you need for rest of this month in the document. A few notes for you. NNOX FDA approval uses a third party review organization in 510k process. This is abbreviated to 3P510k.
I covered the 3P510K in thread here: https://t.co/w7zE882CVk
Reference to Eagle eyes: https://t.co/gT779MFX82
We discover in F-1 that 3P510K recommended clearance of Nanox Source. This triggers a 30 day timeline to approval by FDA. However ...
Eagle-eyes \U0001f985 https://t.co/w1wF3Ysmt1
— Harvey \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 (@realharveymark) February 12, 2021
Look at you favorite broker news for NNOX. I look at 3 different broker none of them comment NNOX from 60 to 80 on news that 3P510k recommended FDA approve NNOX device. NNOX get a letter and slide 10% we get headline. But no headline for big pop 🤷♂️ that’s the friction.