
More from Learning
After reading 100s of short and long ebooks,
We have shortlisted these ebooks every no-code learner should read:
#1 The No-code Revolution
https://t.co/reOSvnTOs6
The ebook from @webflow will provide an overview of the no-code movement and its importance.
It also provides insights on bringing no-code to your company and how it will impact the world!
#2 Zero to MVP with No-code
https://t.co/7JD6RQvocZ
The book written by @MakadiaHarsh, with 21 chapters, provides a complete guide to building no-code apps.
It also explains the difference between no-code, code, & low-code, and 120+ tools to build MVPs.
#3 The What's, How's, and Why's of No-code
https://t.co/YH5L6pJrW0
This book from @QuixyOfficial provides insights on no-code development, how it's different from other development, and why it is essential for stakeholders of an organization.
#4 No-code Ebook
https://t.co/PV6M9oMZCF
The book developed by @NeotaLogic explains the importance of no-code and provides advice on selecting the correct no-code platforms according to requirements.
We have shortlisted these ebooks every no-code learner should read:
#1 The No-code Revolution
https://t.co/reOSvnTOs6
The ebook from @webflow will provide an overview of the no-code movement and its importance.
It also provides insights on bringing no-code to your company and how it will impact the world!
#2 Zero to MVP with No-code
https://t.co/7JD6RQvocZ
The book written by @MakadiaHarsh, with 21 chapters, provides a complete guide to building no-code apps.
It also explains the difference between no-code, code, & low-code, and 120+ tools to build MVPs.
#3 The What's, How's, and Why's of No-code
https://t.co/YH5L6pJrW0
This book from @QuixyOfficial provides insights on no-code development, how it's different from other development, and why it is essential for stakeholders of an organization.
#4 No-code Ebook
https://t.co/PV6M9oMZCF
The book developed by @NeotaLogic explains the importance of no-code and provides advice on selecting the correct no-code platforms according to requirements.
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x