#JUBLFOOD had results today, The tock broke out with solid volume from the falling wedge , stock now above high volume node
RSI jumped above 50
Earlier we could see Bullish RSI divergence
We may see good follow-up bounce towards 650-670
#stocks
Not trading call, academic post
More from Techno Prince
Make time period Weekly
Then click on the encircled + sign in top panel to add different index to compare, u can add any index
Will describe this in our Friday post market session, watch in SE YouTube channel
Sir can u please make a video on how to get this plotted in trading view .Please sir .a small guidance will be highly appreciated .I know there are many like me who don't know to plot it but are shy to admit .it would benefit them too .thank u sir
— rajesh shetty (@shettyrajeshs) May 4, 2021
#LLTS Weekly chart shows the stock is recovering from 61.8% fibonacci pullback of last major rise
— Techno Prince (@Trader_souradep) July 24, 2022
Daily chart shows a a rounding bottom , daily RSI bullish
If it sustains above 3500 it can move towards 3900+ levels and later towards 200 DMA 4480#Nifty pic.twitter.com/6ebtfLMJZd
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?