#HAVELLS has broken out of a flag correction & at the neckline of a rounding bottom pattern
RSI & MACD showing bullish bias
If the stock is able to trade above 1480-85, it may move towards 1625 ( acc. to rounding bottom)/ 1685 (acc. to flag & pole pattern)
#Nifty #stocks
More from Techno Prince
Make time period Weekly
Then click on the encircled + sign in top panel to add different index to compare, u can add any index
Will describe this in our Friday post market session, watch in SE YouTube channel
Sir can u please make a video on how to get this plotted in trading view .Please sir .a small guidance will be highly appreciated .I know there are many like me who don't know to plot it but are shy to admit .it would benefit them too .thank u sir
— rajesh shetty (@shettyrajeshs) May 4, 2021
More from Havells
Double Top Buy, Super Pattern - Bullish & T20 Pattern - Bullish above 1266.91 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/78Tb2dKZkm
HAVELLS
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) January 5, 2021
DTB above 921.43 daily close (Closed above it today) on 1% box size chart, DTB active on 3% chart.
I would still stick to my earlier point that 1250-1300 is the next logical supply zone. https://t.co/9SyiHd90qg pic.twitter.com/LjtqKvX1Ld
Double Top Buy above 1485.56 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/zY8JwRIZUu
HAVELLS
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) August 30, 2021
Double Top Buy, Super Pattern - Bullish & T20 Pattern - Bullish above 1266.91 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/78Tb2dKZkm pic.twitter.com/4lWz25jGgk
You May Also Like
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x