BC ITSTHLEARNINGS
Saved by @SAnngeri

It's the weekend!

Grab a cup of coffee, in this thread we will explore

1. What is risk management?
2. What is position sizing?
3. How to apply both these concepts to reduce volatility and drawdowns in your portfolio?

Lets dive right in.

 What does losing $20 Billion in 24 hours and A Bank being sold for less than $1, have in common?

The answer is Risk Management.
Through this thread we will explore 2 stories - Stories that will teach us the importance of risk management and position sizing in a portfolio.
These stories will show you that no matter

How Rich You Are
How Respected You Are
How Educated You Are

Improper risk management will blow up your portfolio and most likely bankrupt you.
Our first story is the story of Bill Hwang and the saga of Archegos Capital Management.
Bill Hwang was a somewhat a prodigy in finance and one of the wealthiest individual in US with a net worth of $20 Billion.
Bill Hwang had a modest upbringing, his family immigrated to the US from South Korea in 1980s. Soon after immigrating to US, his father passed away and Bill Hwang took up the night shift at a local McDonalds to help feed his family.
From these modest roots, Bill Hwang climbed up the ladder of finance and became one the most revered fund managers at Tiger Management started by the legendary hedge fund manager Julian Robertson.
Bill Hwang had to eventually shut down his hedge fund called Tiger Asia and from the proceeds of that fund he started his family office called Archegos Capital Management.
At Archegos, Bill Hwang turned $200 Million of his own money into $20 Billion in under 7 years.
Despite this wealth, Bill Hwang lived a modest living. He had a single house in suburban New Jersey and drive a Hyundai SUV.

No luxury houses and cars for him.
March 22, 2021

Viacom CBS announces a stock and convertible bond sale after market closes for that day.

Viacom wanted to raise money and for what so ever reason, market didn't like this new stock and bond sale from Viacom.
That week, Viacom CBS shares would lose 60% of its value.
And Bill Hwang would lose $20 Billion.
Why did Bill Hwang lose all his wealth with the drop of a single stock?

Cause, Bill Hwang was levered massively. He used a financial instrument called a total return swap (which is a type of OTC derivative) to leverage all his positions.
A simple 10% fall in any of his stocks was enough to trigger a margin call.
A margin call on one or two of his positions would have been fine, Bill would simply sell some of his other holdings to pay for the margin.
But, see as soon as the street realized that Archegos wasn't immediately able to pay for the margin call on Viacom shares, his other positions started to tank as well.
Bill had bought these Total Return Swaps with almost all the banks on Wall Street, if Bill wasn't able to fund his margin calls, these banks would be forced to liquidate his holdings and incur losses.
As these holdings were very large, the first bank to liquidate would be hurt the least.
Goldman Sachs was the first one to dump these holdings, Credit Suisse was the last.

Goldman escaped unscathed by this entire mess while Credit Suisse took one the biggest losses in their entire history.
As for Bill Hwang he lost it all, in matter of 24 hours.

$20 Billion, his life's earnings, all gone, poof, zero, zlich, nada!
The sad part is, all of Bill's stock holdings recovered most of their losses the next week, but because Bill was levered his portfolio didn't survive to see that day.
Lesson #1

Never take on leverage and never invest with borrowed money

Borrowed money is like the grim reaper that is waiting to kill your portfolio at the first instance

If a prodigy like Bill Hwang wasn't able to survive with leverage, why would you?
Had Bill hadn't leveraged himself, he would have survived and recovered most of his losses.
Bill was actually given the option by his banks to liquidate half his holdings and pay for the margin call. ~$10 Billion

After paying for the call, he would still be left with ~$10 Billion and live to survive another day.
Bill Hwang didn't agree to that.
Lesson #2

Be willing to take a loss.

No investment is without risk and knowing the risks in an investment will help you minimize losses if things go south.
Our second story highlights this lesson.
Barings Bank was one of the oldest bank in UK. At its prime, the Queen of England had an account there.

It was founded in 1762 and almost 233 years later in 1995, the Bank would be bought by ING for less than $1.
Barings hired a trader called Nick Leeson and Lesson single handedly bought the entire institution down.
Nick Leeson took on speculative trades in Japan's Nikkei's index during the Japanese market boom.

Leeson used to bet if the index would go up or down and if it moved in the direction he was betting he would make money.
Initially this worked and Leeson made a lot of money for the bank. The bank in return gave him a free leash and he was allowed to take as many trades irrespective of how speculative they were.
Just like with any bet that has 50:50 odds, these bets soon turned sour and Nick had to book losses.

Instead of stopping there Nick tried to recover these losses by hiding them from the Banks books and taking even larger bets in hopes that they would recover all the losses.
Nick would have maybe succeed too, had it not been for an earthquake in Japan that cause Nikkei to report one of the biggest single day falls.
Kobe Earthquake of 1995 was one of the most intense in Japan. While building his positions Leeson would have never imagined that an earthquake could occur and wipe his entire position and bring down his employer.
Lesson #3

You don't know, what you don't know.
If you're working with leverage and borrowed ideas then anything can wipe you out.

Your task as an investor is to be fully aware of every risk that the investment has.

The probability of some risks maybe higher than others but there is no investment with zero risk.
In each of these stories, the protagonist had made some common errors.

- They used excessive leverage
- They didn't know how to take a loss
- They threw risk management out the door
- Their positions didn't reflect the proper risk return ratio
Other than not taking any leverage, position sizing is extremely important in managing risk within a portfolio.
Here is an example of how I size my positions.

The three factors that I consider are

1. Margin of Safety
2. Depth of Research
3. Longevity of Earnings
Only when an opportunity checks of all three boxes is when I try to take a position in.

If my depth of research and longevity of earnings in a position is high then I will start with a small allocation and allocate big if margin of safety increases.
Risk comes from not knowing what you own and not from concentrating into positions you own.

Diversifying into 50 stocks will not eliminate the risk from your portfolio.

Knowing majority of risks of all 10 stocks you own will certainly help you manage it.
Look at the positions you own, determine their margin of safety, be honest with yourself about your depth of research and determine the longevity of earnings for these businesses.

You will get your answer on how much to allocate.
With this, we come to an end of this thread.
I hope this helped you understand what not to do and how to size positions in your portfolio.
If you find this thread useful then follow me
@itsTarH

I write a new thread every weekend.

All my previous work, can be found here.
https://t.co/az1Rsw05TO
I also teach a class on Personal Finance, if you're interested.

Sign up using the link below to get free 30 days access to it.

https://t.co/NWZOPx8dvW

https://t.co/r7uNYuqjsn
Also, write and publish long from articles on my substack (https://t.co/pOJSMEyzOn)

Subscribe for free, if you're interested.

Thank you to the 2000+ of you who already have!

Here is a recent deep dive I wrote on PolicyBazaar.
https://t.co/w14k2xE0fQ
If you want to know more about Archegos and Barnings Bank, here are two great videos that will help you learn.
Archegos Capital Management
https://t.co/XwPpgIV60D
Barings Bank
https://t.co/rSkzSCNvJj
Thank you for reading, please retweet the first tweet in this thread for a broader reach.

See you all next weekend!

More from Tar ⚡

Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
Niti Ayog is one of the best places to look at, if you want to learn more about the upcoming reforms, outlook on India for next decade and some of the most pressing economical issues of our generation.

Here is a recent one on EV charging infra.

https://t.co/BGoCTVnlRS
SCREENERS
Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
Don't expect the earnings to go anywhere till FY23.
Real growth will only come post FY24.

I expect the stock to either correct or stay muted till then.
SEQUENT
Advertisement
Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
Open Question to fellow investors tracking Music Industry.

A business like Universal which controls more than 1/3rd of all published music globally is selling for less than 6x FY20 Sales.

Why are Indian businesses like Saregama / Tips selling for 11x, 20x their sales?

If I include all of the revenue generated by entire firm, its selling for ~4.5x FY20 Sales


Universal Listing Market Cap ~ 40 Billion USD
FY 20 Revenues ~ 8.87 B USD or 7.4B EUR

Catalogue of Music includes every international artist you can possibly name

Either Universal is grossly undervalued or Saregama/Tips are grossly overvalued.

https://t.co/aHzWSYtcUt


https://t.co/v0EMoCuYKX
MUSIC
Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
Semi conductor index is often considered a leading indicator of health of the economy

Micron: 'we see upcoming significant sequential declines in revenue & margins'

Nvidia: 'Will slow down hiring & control expenses as the company deals with a challenging macro environment'
SCREENERS
Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
@vrael5 @jitenkparmar No, they have a agreement with Tesla and it's the private company of Panasonic that makes these batteries

CATL is a good bet in this space

Battery industry has many similarities of semi conductor industry

High cost of entry
Limited players
Protected Tech
Need Scale to Survive

India needs to build its own battery & not just assemble parts imported from China and Korea

There are some very promising start ups in India trying to extend the life of a lithium ion battery but none that are doing research in Solid State

$QS is my bet on solid state future
RENEWABLE

More from Itsthlearnings

Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
This is pretty much all there is to valuations 👇🏼 I personally follow this same process.

(Excuse the handwriting, rough notes from CFA L2 Equity Valuations)
ITSTHLEARNINGS , ALL
Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
All my Threads so far 🧵 👇🏼

The One with the Cash Flow Explained


The One with Free Cash Flow Explained


The One with Mutual Funds


The One on Laurus Labs
ITSTHLEARNINGS , ALL , INVESTING
Advertisement
Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
Corrected my mistake today, bought #Mastek

First identified it at 1100, by the time I finished researching it went to 1800 Thought will wait and invest at pull back. Soon it was at 2800+

Bought today at 2375
15% of PF
ITSTHLEARNINGS , ALL
Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
Saw a few posts where #LaurusLabs is being floated as 100x candidate from here.

That would mean it would need a market cap of 35 lakh crore+ ($466 Billion) to achieve that goal.

Not going to happen.

Most optimistic goal is a 3 lakh cr market cap ($40 Billion) in next 10 yrs.

Don't fall for accounts selling you false hope
Apply some common sense

Folks who bought Laurus at its lowest of Rs 52 per share may (Big May) see a 100 bagger, entering now will not

Laurus is my largest position, so this is not a criticism, just setting realistic expectations
ITSTHLEARNINGS
Tar \u26a1
Tar ⚡
@itsTarH
Lot of DMs on when to sell. Read the below thread and bookmark it.

It will answer all your questions on when, why and how to sell 👇🏼
ITSTHLEARNINGS

You May Also Like

Janmajit Sinha
Janmajit Sinha
@Impregnable007
#Thread - 1/21

A story of a brave woman who let her "breast" cut to protect the life of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose!

Neera Arya was born on March 5 1902 in Khekra Nagar, Uttar Pradesh in a distinguished & eminent businessman Seth Chhajumal's family. Since her childhood,


2/21
She was a true nationalist & always had a vision of becoming a part of the freedom fighter movement. She was also reportedly accused as an undercover by the British Govt.

That was the time when her father's business was flourishing in Calcutta, though his business was..

3/21
spread across the country but Calcutta was the center of his business and that was one of the reasons why her education was done in Calcutta. During that period of time, she had learned quite a few languages along with Bengali, Hindi, English.

4/21
Her father got her married to a CID Inspector "Shrikant Jairanjan Das" in British India but they were two different individuals, Neera Arya was a true nationalist but her husband was a true British servant. She was highly motivated & she had an urge of getting us freedom..

5/21
so she ended up joining the Jhansi Regiment in Azad Hind Fauz after the marriage. It was the regiment that the British always accused them of spying on British Govt.

It was the time when Neera's husband Jairanjan Das was given the responsibility to spy on Netaji Subhash..
CULTURE
Zena Hitz
Zena Hitz
@zenahitz
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
CULTURE
Advertisement
Emma Hilton
Emma Hilton
@FondOfBeetles
This is Kuinini ‘Nini’ Manumua, the woman who was ultimately displaced by inclusion of Laurel Hubbard.

She’s 21, and it would have been her first Olympics.
ALL
\U0001d54d\U0001d560\U0001d56a\U0001d552\U0001d558\U0001d556\U0001d563
𝕍𝕠𝕪𝕒𝕘𝕖𝕣...
@V0YAGERTWEETS
Ｇａｕ Ｍａｔａ Ｉｎ Ｖｅｄｉｃ
Ｃｕｌｔｕｒｅ

It is said that the one who bears the dust thrown from the hoof of Gaumata on his head, as if taking a bath in the water of the teerth sthalam and getting rid of all sins.


Ved and all other Hindu scriptures venerate the cow. The Vedic dictionary, Nighantu, gives amongst other synonyms of 'Gau' [ or cow] the words 'Aghnya', 'Ahi', and 'Aditi'.

Yaska the vedic decoder and commentator on Nighantu, defines these as-

Aghnya —— the one that ought not to be killed
Ahi —— the one that must not be slaughtered.
Aditi —— the one that ought not to be cut into pieces.

These three names of cow signify that this is an animal which should not to be put to tortures. These words appear frequently throughout the Veda in context of the cow.

But in due course the falsehood of killing cows spread far and wide and they became even more deep rooted when western scholars with their half baked knowledge of Sanskrit transliterated these interpretations of commentaries of Sayanacharya ,
ALL
Groww
Groww
@_groww
You want to buy a house.

You take a loan from the bank.

The bank asks you, “what if you don’t pay back?”

You say, “take my home and sell it”.

(Thread)

That makes sense. The bank gives you a loan and in case you don’t pay, the bank will take over your house and sell it and recover its money.

That’s collateral.

Banks also lend money to big corporations. With them, banks don’t always have collateral.

So a loan where the bank has collateral is considered safer for the bank.

In the early 2000s, the banks in the USA were giving out loans to people for buying houses.

The economy had just recovered from the tech bubble in 2000 where many banks had given out loans to businesses that had shut down.

In that backdrop, the banks found giving home loans safer.
ALL , 2008 CRASH , 2008 RECESSION