Corrected my mistake today, bought #Mastek
First identified it at 1100, by the time I finished researching it went to 1800 Thought will wait and invest at pull back. Soon it was at 2800+
Bought today at 2375
15% of PF
More from Tar ⚡
China Index has corrected ~40% since its peak
Lot of regulatory crackdown in China. Top rated companies are available for huge discounts. $BABA for example now has a market cap of less than 600 Billion and is bigger than Amazon in every regard.
I have been aggressively investing more in Chinese equities than Indian ones.
https://t.co/W1RWdKU3sy
Lot of regulatory crackdown in China. Top rated companies are available for huge discounts. $BABA for example now has a market cap of less than 600 Billion and is bigger than Amazon in every regard.
I have been aggressively investing more in Chinese equities than Indian ones.
https://t.co/W1RWdKU3sy
More from Itsthlearnings
Asset Allocation doesn't have one clear answer and shouldn't depend on stage of the market.
It depends on your
- Risk Appetite
- Goals
- Psychology
- Age
- Responsibilities
1/n https://t.co/aJjy4N90J9
Someone who is
Young
Right out of College
Doesn't Need Money for Next 10 years
Doesn't Have any Dependents
should be allocated more towards Equities than someone who is
Old
Heading for Retirement
Needs Consistent Income
Has Many Dependents
2/n
Your psychology also has the biggest impact. Are you someone who gets afraid and loses sleep over 5 to 10% drawdowns and wants to book profits as soon as an investment gains in value
or Are you someone who can sit peacefully and do not let the daily movement of market impact you
Also allocate based on Goals.
(Extract taken from my Personal Finance Course, Releasing on SkillShare on Sunday, link to sign up for a Free access below)
https://t.co/IdBvCqO2DH
It depends on your
- Risk Appetite
- Goals
- Psychology
- Age
- Responsibilities
1/n https://t.co/aJjy4N90J9
Greatest challenge in the bull market is sound asset allocation which I have been facing alot. Want to buy super fundamentals cos. but can't buy em call. Latter is cos. % allocation in your portfolio.
— Amrit (@HeyAmrit) July 23, 2021
Can you'll shed light@connectgurmeet @Investor_Mohit @itsTarH @AnyBodyCanFly
Someone who is
Young
Right out of College
Doesn't Need Money for Next 10 years
Doesn't Have any Dependents
should be allocated more towards Equities than someone who is
Old
Heading for Retirement
Needs Consistent Income
Has Many Dependents
2/n
Your psychology also has the biggest impact. Are you someone who gets afraid and loses sleep over 5 to 10% drawdowns and wants to book profits as soon as an investment gains in value
or Are you someone who can sit peacefully and do not let the daily movement of market impact you
Also allocate based on Goals.
(Extract taken from my Personal Finance Course, Releasing on SkillShare on Sunday, link to sign up for a Free access below)
https://t.co/IdBvCqO2DH
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
