
Phenomenal article/compilation on "The Biggest Mistakes Investors Make". h/t @manualofideas @JMihaljevic 👏
cc: @dmuthuk @Gautam__Baid @saxena_puru
My fav pts in the thread below

More from Ram Bhupatiraju
Investing websites/blogs that I shared during the @FintwitSummit last weekend. With some minor changes and lot of additional commentary in the thread below. ⬇️⬇️

My investing diet 🗒️
✔️Zero Financial TV.
✔️Very little Market & Stock prices commentary/content.
✔️Lot of Company produced presentations/statements.
✔️ Lot of Investing Podcasts (thread some other time).
✔️Lot of below awesome content whenever I find time.
Tech : Have to start with my favorite sector
✅ @stratechery
For deeper understanding of Platforms and Aggregators.
https://t.co/VsNwRStY9C
✅ @benedictevans
Phenomenal essays related to
✅ @adam_hartung
Extremely good if you are into following & investing in strong/durable trends.
https://t.co/IOE1pmkqbi
✅ @BaillieGifford
Mind blowing, if you're into extremely patient and visionary style of
✅ @StackInvesting
Must read if you love the combination of Software + Investing
https://t.co/WQ1yBYzT2m
✅ @hhhypergrowth
Phenomenal writing if you love technical deep dives into SaaS
https://t.co/kcLKITRLz1
✅ @Beth_Kindig
Sharp Tech focused
More from Investing
A pleb's guide to using @Keeper_DAO's hiding game to acquire $Rook below market price and arb it like a pro.
Before reading this thread, please read this one to provide a bit of context:
https://t.co/jLeUJRIjLG
Here we go!
1/
Ok I couldn't resist myself...
— 0x_Infinitum (@CryptoMessiah) February 3, 2021
OOOONNEEE more $Rook post.
Before i get into the REALLY cool shit i want to talk about, let me discuss the arb mining mechanics that were present during the initial distribution phase.
See this image, that's the keeperdao treasury.
1/ pic.twitter.com/Z2sMsZN9jo
Before we really get into the meat of this... please do understand that the hiding game is currently in alpha. Hardware wallets don't work w/ it yet (they will soon).
Sometimes orders go unfilled (improving every day).
2/
A bit more context:
Limit orders on an amm aren't limit orders in the traditional sense. They are actually arbitrage opportunities for keepers. Keepers are bots that operate in the dark forest of ethereum.
3/
Now, let's say you use a service like 1inch or matcha to set your limit orders.
Let's say eth is $900 and you want to sell at $1000.
Eth pumps to $1040 rapidly, a keeper fills your limit order for $1000... everyone is happy. But wait... who gets the extra $40 here?
4/
Hint: it's not you! But what if you could?
This is where the hiding game comes in.
https://t.co/6sBlUWfw00
When you submit a limit order through the hiding game, @Keeper_DAO takes the $40 (or w/e amount) referenced above (this is MEV) and pushes it to the treasury.
5/
Look for the following:
1. PE < 15
2. Low debt
3. Low Float
4. No Analyst Coverage
5. High Promoter Holding
6. Recent Promoter Buying
7. High Operating Leverage
8. Conservative Management
9. Blockbuster Earnings Release
What more you should look at?
Read this post, the quote retweets to this and the
Things I look at before Investing:
— The Disciplined Investor (@Disciplined_Inv) August 27, 2021
Profitable \u2013 Free Cash Flow
Healthy \u2013 Interest Coverage
Quality \u2013 ROCE, ROA, Margins
Valuation \u2013 EV/EBITDA, FCF Yield
Governance \u2013 Dividend, Buybacks
Efficiency \u2013 Cash Conversion Cycle
Growth \u2013 Source of Funds for CAPEX
What do you look at?
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?