First off, my preferred style of investing is more influenced by macro than micro (macroeconomics vs company specific).
THREAD, PM EXIT STRATEGY
I sometimes get the question “At what price do I liquidate my PM portfolio?” The short answer is:
A) I´ll never sell all of it
and
B) I don´t have a PT. I could start selling at $1900 or at $100000, it depends.
For the longer explanation, 👇
First off, my preferred style of investing is more influenced by macro than micro (macroeconomics vs company specific).
I frequently look at certain ratios, or said another way, instrument X relative to instrument Y.
More from Investing
THE MONEY PRINTING GAME:
A pleb's guide to using @Keeper_DAO's hiding game to acquire $Rook below market price and arb it like a pro.
Before reading this thread, please read this one to provide a bit of context:
https://t.co/jLeUJRIjLG
Here we go!
1/
Before we really get into the meat of this... please do understand that the hiding game is currently in alpha. Hardware wallets don't work w/ it yet (they will soon).
Sometimes orders go unfilled (improving every day).
2/
A bit more context:
Limit orders on an amm aren't limit orders in the traditional sense. They are actually arbitrage opportunities for keepers. Keepers are bots that operate in the dark forest of ethereum.
3/
Now, let's say you use a service like 1inch or matcha to set your limit orders.
Let's say eth is $900 and you want to sell at $1000.
Eth pumps to $1040 rapidly, a keeper fills your limit order for $1000... everyone is happy. But wait... who gets the extra $40 here?
4/
Hint: it's not you! But what if you could?
This is where the hiding game comes in.
https://t.co/6sBlUWfw00
When you submit a limit order through the hiding game, @Keeper_DAO takes the $40 (or w/e amount) referenced above (this is MEV) and pushes it to the treasury.
5/
A pleb's guide to using @Keeper_DAO's hiding game to acquire $Rook below market price and arb it like a pro.
Before reading this thread, please read this one to provide a bit of context:
https://t.co/jLeUJRIjLG
Here we go!
1/
Ok I couldn't resist myself...
— 0x_Infinitum (@CryptoMessiah) February 3, 2021
OOOONNEEE more $Rook post.
Before i get into the REALLY cool shit i want to talk about, let me discuss the arb mining mechanics that were present during the initial distribution phase.
See this image, that's the keeperdao treasury.
1/ pic.twitter.com/Z2sMsZN9jo
Before we really get into the meat of this... please do understand that the hiding game is currently in alpha. Hardware wallets don't work w/ it yet (they will soon).
Sometimes orders go unfilled (improving every day).
2/
A bit more context:
Limit orders on an amm aren't limit orders in the traditional sense. They are actually arbitrage opportunities for keepers. Keepers are bots that operate in the dark forest of ethereum.
3/
Now, let's say you use a service like 1inch or matcha to set your limit orders.
Let's say eth is $900 and you want to sell at $1000.
Eth pumps to $1040 rapidly, a keeper fills your limit order for $1000... everyone is happy. But wait... who gets the extra $40 here?
4/
Hint: it's not you! But what if you could?
This is where the hiding game comes in.
https://t.co/6sBlUWfw00
When you submit a limit order through the hiding game, @Keeper_DAO takes the $40 (or w/e amount) referenced above (this is MEV) and pushes it to the treasury.
5/
You May Also Like
1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
Next level tactic when closing a sale, candidate, or investment:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) February 27, 2018
Ask: \u201cWhat needs to be true for you to be all in?\u201d
You'll usually get an explicit answer that you might not get otherwise. It also holds them accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
