How important are historians in achieving historical reconciliation? [THREAD] #History #historian #politics

1. Reparations agreements are a prominent and relevant example of historians being at the forefront of historical reconciliation. As they often involve monetary gains for one party from the other over memory and victimization.
2. Historians are at the forefront of presenting the state with so-called historical 'ammo' to legitimize the request of reparations. This could however be seen as a source of increased tensions, and could lead to an increase of nationalism and hatred due to negative memories.
3. However, a more definitively positive aspect of historical conciliation can also increasingly be seen due to evidence newly uncovered by historians.
4. For instance, as a result of the publishing of Jan Gross’s Neighbors in 2001, Polish president Kwasniewski issued an apology for the murder of 1,600 Jews who were killed by
their neighbors 60 years earlier in Jedwabne.
5. This represented a high point in Poland’s struggle with its history, a struggle that was about both past events
and the nation’s identity.
6. The government had already been investigating the crime, through the Institute of National Remembrance (IPN) who were instructed to scrutinize historical violations of human rights and war crimes.
7. This again shows the importance of historians in the process of independent historical reconciliation, although it could be argued that the historians are simply tool pieces to fulfill the government's purpose, which in this case could be historical reconciliation, not always.
8. Robert R. Weyeneth confirms the importance of events like Kwasniewski's speech by emphasizing the importance of apology in the process of historical reconciliation. He also explores the range and forms of apologies reported in the press during the last decade or so.
9. Overall, it is quite clear in light of recent events that historians play a key and central role in historical conciliation, however it remains unclear whether they play the most important role, due to the control and interventionist nature of governments.
@UnrollThread @Unrollme @UnrollHelper

More from History

You May Also Like

The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.


In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.

In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.

This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.

In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.