Thread on how atheism leads to mental retardation (backed with medical citations🧵💉)

To start with, atheism is an unnatural self-contradicting doctrine.

Medical terminology proves that human beings are naturally pre-disposed to believe in God. Oxford scientists assert that people are "born believers".

https://t.co/kE0Fi588yn
https://t.co/OqyXcGIMJn
It should be known that atheism could never produce an intelligently-functioning society and neither ever will.

Contrastingly, Islam produced several intellectuals & polymaths, was on the forefront of scientific development, boasting 100% literacy rates.

https://t.co/IHixP6D5AU
It is also scientifically proven that atheism led to lesser scientific curiosity and scientific frauds, which is also why atheists incline to pseudo-science.

Whereas, religion in general and Islam in particular boosted education.

https://t.co/19Onc84u3g
Atheists are also likely to affected by pervasive mental and developmental disorders like high-functioning autism.

Cognitive Scientists and renowned Neurologists found that more atheism is leads to greater autism.

https://t.co/zRjEyFoX3P
Highly intelligent people tend to be open-minded and have scientific curiosity.

Whereas, research indicated that atheists tend to be less open-minded and show greater intolerance to contradiction when their beliefs are challenged.

https://t.co/KRZNldiE8B
Religion also has neuroanatomical effects like thicker cerebral cortices & a greater ability to fight depression.

Atheism on the other hand has the highest suicide rates, a direct result of poor mental welfare.

https://t.co/YBk7VBgDQ6
Atheism also leads to lower IQs, a survey found that people who practice their religion by visiting religious institutions on a regular basis, tend to have higher IQs than atheists/irreligious people.

Source: Theodre Beale, General Social Survey (1972-2012)
Atheism also leads to an extremely low Emotional Quotient (EQ).

Atheists have a higher rate of having emotional problems when they disbelieve in God, whereas religiosity is positively associated with emotional intelligence.

https://t.co/L7hYG9UyOY
https://t.co/xehjeJ9Tmm
Atheists are also more likely to be evil psychopaths & criminals.

Science tells us that atheism is positively related to criminal traits which is why most of the mass-murderers historically were atheists.

https://t.co/vRTCth1ja9
Moreover, mental issues is a natural product of atheism.

Believing in God leads to better mental health. While countries like China (world's largest atheistic society) faces the highest number of Alzheimer's & Dementia cases.

https://t.co/UcflNU67Su
https://t.co/0obLKzsA5h
While religious beliefs have logical explanations using logical propositions, atheism has no rationale (is an acquired blunder as (i) explains)

Moreover, atheists are much more likely to believe in pseudo-science and superstition.

https://t.co/fDWo9jlmhV
https://t.co/kNfSI8DJZg
And what will be the fate of atheism?

Scientifically atheism will never survive, because they’re at a biological disadvantage.

In contrast, Islam will outshine other religions, whereas atheism is bound to extinct.
https://t.co/jYFp1vhmA6
https://t.co/tXUSkGPi5i

🧵

More from Health

This is the $1mln question still without an answer: why were these workers cleaning bat guano from that abandoned mine?

Surprisingly we simply don't know.

China would have all interest in clarifying that point if for instance they were prospecting or selling guano. It did not.


What we know is that EcoHealth + WIV were sampling bat sites in the vicinity at the exact time of the workers being in that mine.

#DRASTIC wrote about this and about other oddities in the official story:

Maybe it's just one of these coincidences.

Then it gets interesting: about a year after the miners death, Olival & Epstein from EcoHealth Alliance co-authored a paper about the coronavirus risk infection from bat guano collection.

No mention of the

That paper oddly used some old bat samples collected by DARPA in 2006/7 at the famous Thai bat cave.

It never mentioned that the Thai monks have been doing this every Sunday for many many years without infection.

But most interestingly it never mentioned the Mojiang mine accident, even if the perfect timing and recycling of old DARPA bat samples seem to point to a likely knowledge of it.

Anyway, the idea was to ask for more money, as you correctly
I applaud the #EUCancerPlan *BUT* caution: putting #meat 🥩 (a nourishing, evolutionary food) in the same box as 🚬 to solve a contemporary health challenge, would be basing policy on assumptions rather than robust data.

#FollowTheScience yes, but not just part of it!
THREAD👇


1/ Granted, some studies have pointed to ASSOCIATIONS of HIGH intake of red & processed meats with (slightly!) increased colorectal cancer incidence. Also, @WHO/IARC is often mentioned in support (usually hyperbolically so).

But, let’s have a closer look at all this! 🔍


2/ First, meat being “associated” with cancer is very different from stating that meat CAUSES cancer.

Unwarranted use of causal language is widespread in nutritional sciences, posing a systemic problem & undermining credibility.

3/ That’s because observational data are CONFOUNDED (even after statistical adjustment).

Healthy user bias is a major problem. Healthy middle classes are TOLD to eat less red meat (due to historical rather than rational reasons, cf link). So, they

4/ What’s captured here is sociology, not physiology.

Health-focused Westerners eat less red meat, whereas those who don’t adhere to dietary advice tend to have unhealthier lifestyles.

That tells us very little about meat AS SUCH being responsible for disease.

You May Also Like