Thread on how atheism leads to mental retardation (backed with medical citations🧵💉)

To start with, atheism is an unnatural self-contradicting doctrine.

Medical terminology proves that human beings are naturally pre-disposed to believe in God. Oxford scientists assert that people are "born believers".

https://t.co/kE0Fi588yn
https://t.co/OqyXcGIMJn
It should be known that atheism could never produce an intelligently-functioning society and neither ever will.

Contrastingly, Islam produced several intellectuals & polymaths, was on the forefront of scientific development, boasting 100% literacy rates.

https://t.co/IHixP6D5AU
It is also scientifically proven that atheism led to lesser scientific curiosity and scientific frauds, which is also why atheists incline to pseudo-science.

Whereas, religion in general and Islam in particular boosted education.

https://t.co/19Onc84u3g
Atheists are also likely to affected by pervasive mental and developmental disorders like high-functioning autism.

Cognitive Scientists and renowned Neurologists found that more atheism is leads to greater autism.

https://t.co/zRjEyFoX3P
Highly intelligent people tend to be open-minded and have scientific curiosity.

Whereas, research indicated that atheists tend to be less open-minded and show greater intolerance to contradiction when their beliefs are challenged.

https://t.co/KRZNldiE8B
Religion also has neuroanatomical effects like thicker cerebral cortices & a greater ability to fight depression.

Atheism on the other hand has the highest suicide rates, a direct result of poor mental welfare.

https://t.co/YBk7VBgDQ6
Atheism also leads to lower IQs, a survey found that people who practice their religion by visiting religious institutions on a regular basis, tend to have higher IQs than atheists/irreligious people.

Source: Theodre Beale, General Social Survey (1972-2012)
Atheism also leads to an extremely low Emotional Quotient (EQ).

Atheists have a higher rate of having emotional problems when they disbelieve in God, whereas religiosity is positively associated with emotional intelligence.

https://t.co/L7hYG9UyOY
https://t.co/xehjeJ9Tmm
Atheists are also more likely to be evil psychopaths & criminals.

Science tells us that atheism is positively related to criminal traits which is why most of the mass-murderers historically were atheists.

https://t.co/vRTCth1ja9
Moreover, mental issues is a natural product of atheism.

Believing in God leads to better mental health. While countries like China (world's largest atheistic society) faces the highest number of Alzheimer's & Dementia cases.

https://t.co/UcflNU67Su
https://t.co/0obLKzsA5h
While religious beliefs have logical explanations using logical propositions, atheism has no rationale (is an acquired blunder as (i) explains)

Moreover, atheists are much more likely to believe in pseudo-science and superstition.

https://t.co/fDWo9jlmhV
https://t.co/kNfSI8DJZg
And what will be the fate of atheism?

Scientifically atheism will never survive, because they’re at a biological disadvantage.

In contrast, Islam will outshine other religions, whereas atheism is bound to extinct.
https://t.co/jYFp1vhmA6
https://t.co/tXUSkGPi5i

🧵

More from Health

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.
A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.