Categories Government
"David Thomson\xa0& family" now have a net worth of\xa0$39.8B, according to the newly-updated Forbes billionare list, up from $31.6B in April of 2020, when the list was last updated.https://t.co/xOVI3Vb6sT
— Louisette Lanteigne \U0001f30e\u270c\ufe0f\u2696\ufe0f\u2665\ufe0f (@lulex) January 7, 2021
The world's richest man, Bezos currently has a net worth of $187.5B — more than a third of which was earned between April and September of
Canada's covid wage subsidiary released in April 2020 worth 71 billion.
The Bank of China (BOC), SNC-Lavalin and WE Charity were recipients of taxpayer-funded the Covid 19 Canadian Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS)
Canada has given over 100 contracts to SNC Lavalin since Covid in spite of their continued roll in Operation Carwash corruption scandals in Brazil.
@PaulDoroshenko hits the ball out of the park!
This is exactly what we need to do.
And remember, Harper stacked public service with loyalists. RCMP, judiciary, senate, government departments.
Denazification was the official term to describe the processes to de-platform nazis from all aspects of German society after the war.
— Paul Doroshenko, Q.C. (@PaulDoroshenko) January 9, 2021
It was effective.
Now the US must do the same.
\u23fa close his Twitter account \u2705
\u23fa arrest the thugs \u2705
\u23fa denounce nazism
\u23fa remove nazis pic.twitter.com/p9x3DFFOtB
We need Denazification in Canada too!
There can be no tolerance for intolerance.
Many are opining about free speech. In Canada we have freedom of expression and it comes with some caveats. Harmful hate speech is not free.
We have been inundated with hate speech for decades.
It must stop. We must remove the fascists from power and eradicate the platforms they use to build support.
I’ve taught both my children by age 9 what fascism is and what it looks like. I can be done.
School based education is a must to nullify hatred.
But what about the adults? First we remove the ability to indoctrinate through the internet. Mainstream media needs to be purged of nazi sympathizers. And the internet needs regulation. Because some people cannot be trusted to refrain from hate speech.
You got a problem with restrictions on speech, take a look at the US where any form of speech is free. Lying, disinformation, promotion of hatred and psychological manipulation propaganda. And the result is January 6, 2021 attempted “patriot” insurrection.
🚨ITALY ON BRINK OF DOWNFALL OVER CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE DIVIDE
1/20🙀
@GenFlynn @GeorgePapa19 @PatrickByrne @JovanHPulitzer @SidneyPowell1 @Capezzone @Sadiso @realDonaldTrump @CarrollQuigley1 @We_Have_Risen @KanekoaTheGreat @JudgeJeanine @
The FIRST story to break out of Italy, by Cesare Sacchetti
https://t.co/zjllaVBuf8 ⬇️
The second story from Sacchetti is BONKERS! ⬇️
https://t.co/JLRJCaYbUV ⬇️
Maria Zack, founder of https://t.co/IaftMj8cs0 on January 6th broke this story which corroborates Sacchetti's claims.
Ex CIA operative, Bradley Johnson, is the third source corroborating both Zack and Sacchetti.
Sort of. But I wouldn't base public policy on the finding.
Why? Let's turn to the data.
[THREAD]
Democracies do not go to war with each other. There are a lot of empirical data to support that theory. I summarize that literature here. https://t.co/SQLk9J9rZ8 https://t.co/tLlSyisEIU
— Michael McFaul (@McFaul) December 12, 2020
The idea of a "Democratic Peace" is a widely held view that's been around for a long time.
By 1988, there already existed enough studies on the topic for Jack Levy to famously label Democratic Peace "an empirical law"
The earliest empirical work on the topic was the 1964 report by Dean Babst published in the "Wisconsin Sociologist"
Using the war participation data from Quincy Wright's "A Study of War", Babst produced the following two tables
The tables show that democracies were NOT on both sides (of course, Finland is awkward given that it fought WITH Nazi Germany against the Soviet Union).
Babst expanded his study beyond the World Wars in a 1972 paper in Industrial Research. He confirmed his finding.
I'm sure you're loyal to your boss, but this man incited violence and you helped him. There is no "following orders" defense that will save you. You are part of this now.
And it is so much more serious than him simply "raising concerns."
🧵
Sadly, much of the media and many members of the Washington establishment want to deceive Americans into thinking those who raised concerns incited violence, simply by voicing the concern. That\u2019s false. And the allegation itself is corrosive and dangerous. https://t.co/drhsK54MzQ pic.twitter.com/rEk9G5DOo5
— Senator Hawley Press Office (@SenHawleyPress) January 13, 2021
Prior to November 3rd, Joshua had nothing to say about Pennsylvania's vote by mail legislation.
2/
In fact, Joshua didn't have squat to say about election integrity either.
3/
By November 4th, when it was apparent that Trump would likely lose the election, Joshua--as a sitting US Senator--started tweeting out that Michigan was hiding secrets from the public.
Sowing doubt. Fanning the flames.
4/
So Joshua started this fake call for election integrity--a call he'd never made before.
At first he threw the whole kitchen sink out there--BigTech, ballot harvesting, poll watchers, counting, etc.
Sowing doubt. Fanning the flames.
5/