How does HM Government spending take place? A Thread:

HM Government spending begins in Parliament via various annual legislative mechanisms: Supply and Appropriation Bills (Main Estimates) and Supply and Appropriation (Anticipation and Adjustments) Bills.
As per the Exchequer and Audit Departments Act 1866, S.15 para.2, HM Treasury places a request, known as a requisition, with the Comptroller and Auditor General, who first scruntinises and then grants HM Treasury a ‘credit’ on the 'Exchequer Account' at the Bank of England.
The grant of credit is not a balance of money, but a ledger balance that shows how much money will be made *available* for HM Treasury to spend, according to the requirements of government departments and in accordance with parliamentary Supply and Appropriation Acts.
In theory a government department could draw down its Exchequer credit on an annual basis, as it does not require a money balance to be put immediately at its disposal. Typically, however, government departments draw down their Exchequer credit on a monthly basis.
Each government department holds an account (in reality several accounts) called a ‘Resource Account’ within the Government Banking Service (GBS) into which they receive their allocation of Exchequer credits. The GBS is run by HMRC.
Commercial banks are contracted to the GBS to provide banking transmission services, such as BACS. NatWest, for eg, is contracted on the expenditure side.
And so, as far as a government department is concerned, a Resource Account operates to all intents and purposes just like a normal, standard bank account.
On any business day a government department will present its payment requirements to its GBS bank, NatWest, for eg salary payments, which will then be submitted into the BACS system for clearing and settlement 3 days later.
There are 3 protocols within the BACS system. BACS grade 3 protocol applies only to government and substitutes the Resource Accounts of government departments, which hold Exchequer credits, for a GBS ‘Drawing Account’ at the Bank of England, which hold Bank of England money.
The Exchequer Funds and Accounts Team (EFA) working in HM Treasury run the Central Funds, including the Consolidated Fund (CF), which is also held at the Bank of England. During the business day the GBS presents forecasts to the EFA of spending requirements.
As a result of GBS forecasts, and according to the Exchequer and Audit Departments Act 1866, S.15 para.3, HM Treasury submits a Treasury Order to the Bank of England to issue funds from the Consolidated Fund to credit the GBS ‘Supply Account’.
The Consolidated Fund begins and ends each business day with a zero balance. Thus, there are no funds to draw upon. Instead, the Consolidated Fund goes overdrawn as the Bank of England extends intra-day credit. The intra-day credit is Bank of England money, public deposits.
As necessary, when payments require settlement, the GBS Supply Account feeds sums of Bank of England money into the GBS Drawing Account. Thus, the GBS Drawing Account has a money balance on hand to settle payments.
3 days after BACS submission, clearing and settlement of government payments occurs by both the GBS Resource Accounts of government departments and the GBS Drawing Account being marked down.
Simultaneously, ‘Reserve Accounts’ of commercial banks held at the Bank of England and commercial bank deposit accounts of their various customers, the recipients of government payments, are marked up.
And that is how HM Government spending takes place. Simple! For much more detail, see: #End https://t.co/8EeQhVlvLb

More from Government

Oh my Goodness!!!

I might have a panic attack due to excitement!!

Read this thread to the end...I just had an epiphany and my mind is blown. Actually, more than blown. More like OBLITERATED! This is the thing! This is the thing that will blow the entire thing out of the water!


Has this man been concealing his true identity?

Is this man a supposed 'dead' Seal Team Six soldier?

Witness protection to be kept safe until the right moment when all will be revealed?!

Who ELSE is alive that may have faked their death/gone into witness protection?


Were "golden tickets" inside the envelopes??


Are these "golden tickets" going to lead to their ultimate undoing?

Review crumbs on the board re: 'gold'.


#SEALTeam6 Trump re-tweeted this.
Long thread: Because I couldn’t find anything comprehensive, I’m just going to post everything I’ve seen in the news/Twitter about Trump’s activities related to the Jan 6th insurrection. I think the timing & context of his actions/inactions will matter a lot for a senate trial.

12/12: The earlier DC protest over the electoral college vote during clearly inspired Jan 6th. On Dec 12th, he tweeted: “Wow! Thousands of people forming in Washington (D.C.) for Stop the Steal. Didn’t know about this, but I’ll be seeing them! #MAGA.”


12/19: Trump announces the Jan. 6th event by tweeting, “Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!” Immediately, insurrectionists begin to discuss the “Wild Protest.” Just 2 days later, this UK political analyst predicts the violence


12/26-27: Trump announces his participation on Twitter. On Dec. 29, the FBI sends out a nationwide bulletin warning legislatures about attacks https://t.co/Lgl4yk5aO1


1/1: Trump tweets the time of his protest. Then he retweets “The calvary is coming” on Jan. 6!” Sounds like a war? About this time, the FBI begins visiting right wing extremists to tell them not to go--does the FBI tell the president? https://t.co/3OxnB2AHdr

You May Also Like

Ivor Cummins has been wrong (or lying) almost entirely throughout this pandemic and got paid handsomly for it.

He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...


... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:


Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.

Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9


Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."

I wonder why...

Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x


Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.

Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq