"Action track 2" of the UN Food Systems Summit will be:
-Chaired by EAT's founder
-Have WHO as anchoring agency
-Have an "innovation pillar" led by the Good Food Institute (a lobby group for vegan lab-foods)

Now imagine the outcome of this triumvirate!🤔
https://t.co/HIqS0q5at3

Background here: https://t.co/1LL7ba3Quz
What is the GFI? An extremely well-funded lobby platform, representing producers of lab-generated foods that are meant to take over "outdated" animal foods.
On the advisory board we find some people like the founder of FAIRR (Jeremy Coller) and the Saudi Prince Khaled bin Alwaleed.
Here's some info on FAIRR, Alwaleed, and the $$$.

https://t.co/1LL7ba3Quz
To give you an idea of the mindset: "dairy is the root of all environmental evil", says the guy with the big wallet.

This person is advising the GFI, which in turn will be leading the "innovation pillar" of the UN Food Systems Summit... !

https://t.co/Ap99qrVIMo
The vegan-warrior Prince is also close to EAT, of which -remember- the founder is *chairing* the "sustainable diet" track of the same UN Food Systems Summit

https://t.co/hbCPzPyKwr
Here's the happy bunch together: EAT's founder (middle with dog), the Prince (right), & a couple of GFI-linked folks at the UN headquarters in UN, discussing transition options to a veganized future.

This was in 2018.
https://t.co/o15Rwntfhp
There's more:
50by40= vegan & animal rights organizations + WRI (close ally of EAT), True Health Initiative (with EAT's Walter Willett as core member) & GFI!

Their aim? '50% reduction in global production & consumption of farmed animal products by 2040"
https://t.co/twl5UDsCza
So what's the UN Food Systems Summit's track on Sustainable Diets going to bring us, with these people in charge? Wait & see. But it probably will involve a Great Food Transformation. A what? This: https://t.co/F8NzBgTiUf
For those able to read French, this excellent book by @GillesLuneau talks in detail about the GFI background ($$$, vegan ideology, transhumanism, ...):

https://t.co/1d7LQcrtTe
Feel like exploring more? This metathread should keep you busy...

https://t.co/rIXTJla2pJ

More from Government

How does a government put a legislation on 'hold'? Is there any constitutional mechanism for the executive to 'pause' a validly passed legislation? Genuine Koshan.


So a committee of 'wise men/women' selected by the SC will stand in judgement over the law passed by


Here is the thing - a law can be stayed based on usual methods, it can be held unconstitutional based on violation of the Constitution. There is no shortcut to this based on the say so of even a large number of people, merely because they are loud.


Tomorrow can all the income tax payers also gather up at whichever maidan and ask for repealing the income tax law? It hurts us and we can protest quite loudly.

How can a law be stayed or over-turned based on the nuisance value of the protestors? It is anarchy to allow that.

You May Also Like

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.