July 2009.
Government virus expert paid £116k by swine flu vaccine manufacturers.

"The 'false' pandemic: Drug firms cashed in on scare over swine flu, claims Euro health chief."

January 2010.
https://t.co/TSV4XgtyTb
https://t.co/nDs2ifa6jk
The 2016 simulation of a pandemic found holes in the UK’s readiness for such a crisis

https://t.co/T6284Ajm7t
November 2018
"Ineffective flu vaccine added to 50,000 extra deaths last winter. Office National Statistics."

"Human suffering and lost lives over winter 'predictable, preventable and shameful."

https://t.co/EUcJLkeCoe
May 2019

"In damning indictment of British welfare policies, UN rapporteur on extreme poverty says successive governments continued to inflict austerity 'largely unabated, despite the tragic social consequences"
https://t.co/wHhE3AisLq
2020.

"Dr Jonathan Stokes from The University of Manchester said: “The large excess of deaths in care homes shows England, and other countries, didn’t adequately protect this vulnerable group in the first wave of COVID-19."
https://t.co/c5O2UeP7Wv
November 2020

Will Chancellor Rishi Sunak profit from Coronavirus vaccine.

https://t.co/BONXvqpnDo
December 2020

Sir Patrick Vallance who leads the Government’s expert advisory panel on vaccines, holding shares worth £600,000 in pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline from his time as president of the pharmaceutical company.

https://t.co/4CoFci1aDJ
January 2021

UK draws up plans to mix coronavirus vaccines.

Mixing Covid-19 vac not recommended. If your first dose is the Pfizer vaccine you should not be given the AstraZeneca vaccine for your second dose and vice versa.~
Head of Immunisations PHE:

https://t.co/IeS1ycPnQc
January 2021

London hospital matron tells BBC Radio 5 Live of ward full of kids with coronavirus.

However, a consultant paediatrician says" Covid is rife in hospitals, but not among children - and that is corroborated by my colleagues across London."

https://t.co/XD0lVcirVX
@threadreaderapp unroll please.

More from Government

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?