I suspect that Emergentism and Enactivism have very little appeal in a world dominated by Reductionists.

To get funding one must present a reductionist idea. A perfect example of this is the European Blue Brain project. https://t.co/0H1b11rVRN
I also suspect that pitches that show how one can get a competitive advantage over the rest of humanity has a much greater appeal than pitches that show how one can that has a unified view of humanity.
My book 'The Deep Learning Playbook' out sold my other book 'Artificial Intuition' by a metric mile. I am however more proud of the latter book.
That's because the word 'playbook' conveys a thing that once possessed gives one new power. In contrast, the word 'intuition' does not feel like a think but more of a process (a thought process). Processes don't appear like things that can be owned.
We pay a premium to go to university so that we can own a thing that is a symbol of our connections and competence. We aren't paying for learning how to think better about this world.
We buy the latest gadgets, not because they are more useful to us but rather because of the social signaling that ownership of that new gadget endows us with.
It is a hard sell if your product implies that your customer must make an intellectual effort to acquire its benefits. The more you can outsource thinking, the more appealing one's product. That's why an AI product will always be appealing.
Products that require that someone actually do something is a product that will be ignored. It is very rare for anyone to pay for a programming language. Lot of stuff that's open source that you can get for free are in the same product category that requires exerting effort.
Brains are intrinsically lazy. Things that can be acquired to avoid work has the greatest appeal. Explains the appeal of the stock market. https://t.co/PP9V1TRGVe
There is no greater product than that thing that prints money (isn't this what bitcoin and ethereum are about?).
That affliction of collecting books that you never ever read (Tsundoku (Japanese: 積ん読)) is a manifestation of this prioritization of thing over process.
It is indeed odd that the thing that they call bitcoin isn't an actual thing. It's a process. The argument of gold bugs against bitcoin has always been that the former is a real thing. But does that really matter?
Bitcoin, gold, stocks are all manifestations of the human inclination for ownership of things. Pollution, consumerism, climate change, the loss of meaning are all manifestations of the same inclination.
This is because meaning only emerges through enactivism. Ownership leads only to symbolism. There is no grounding on symbols alone.
@threadreaderapp unroll

More from Carlos E. Perez

Nice to discover Judea Pearl ask a fundamental question. What's an 'inductive bias'?


I crucial step on the road towards AGI is a richer vocabulary for reasoning about inductive biases.

explores the apparent impedance mismatch between inductive biases and causal reasoning. But isn't the logical thinking required for good causal reasoning also not an inductive bias?

An inductive bias is what C.S. Peirce would call a habit. It is a habit of reasoning. Logical thinking is like a Platonic solid of the many kinds of heuristics that are discovered.

The kind of black and white logic that is found in digital computers is critical to the emergence of today's information economy. This of course is not the same logic that drives the general intelligence that lives in the same economy.

More from Government

You May Also Like

https://t.co/6cRR2B3jBE
Viruses and other pathogens are often studied as stand-alone entities, despite that, in nature, they mostly live in multispecies associations called biofilms—both externally and within the host.

https://t.co/FBfXhUrH5d


Microorganisms in biofilms are enclosed by an extracellular matrix that confers protection and improves survival. Previous studies have shown that viruses can secondarily colonize preexisting biofilms, and viral biofilms have also been described.


...we raise the perspective that CoVs can persistently infect bats due to their association with biofilm structures. This phenomenon potentially provides an optimal environment for nonpathogenic & well-adapted viruses to interact with the host, as well as for viral recombination.


Biofilms can also enhance virion viability in extracellular environments, such as on fomites and in aquatic sediments, allowing viral persistence and dissemination.