During the time of Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee's government, a famous company, Enron, planned to install a factory in Dabhol, Maharashtra.
But, it could not happen, due to the resistance of the locals.

As a result, angry with the changing odd circumstances, Enron filed a case of compensation of । 38,000 crore on the Government of India.
Vajpayee government appointed Harish Salve (whom you all know).
Salveji won the case of Kulbhushan Jadhav by fighting in the International Court of Justice as an advocate for the Government of India.
But you will be shocked to know that, Enron's lawyer became P.Chidambaram i.e. P. Chidambaram went against India.
Time went on.
Later 'UPA' government formed. Cabinet Minister Chidambaram could not fight a lawsuit on behalf of Enron. But he remained a legal advisor and, in favor of Enron
Next disclosure is stunning.
Chidambaram immediately removed Harish Salve from Enron case.
Khabar Qureshi appointed instead of Harish Salve. You got it right.This is the same Pakistani lawyer who, in the case of Kulbhushan Jadhav, filed the case of Pakistan government.Congress has given 1400/- crore to Pakistani lawyer on behalf of the GoI as a lawyer's fee.
Finally India lost the lawsuit and the government of India had to pay a huge compensation of 38,000 /- crore. But, the Lutian media either gave this news a goal or didn't show it in a straight wa
Now think how much fees would have been charged to fight a case of 38000/- crore
Readers who decide the fee of a lawyer in a case of a claim will know that, after seeing the lawyer's case, from ten percent to sixty percent up in percentage of fees.And why there was no ruckus on this?
If this case was in the time of Modi, and the Indian government would have lost in the court, then?Leave the sycophants, the devotees would have also run after Modi with a stick.
And one more funny thing.. The companies that invested in Enron and filed this project only invested
$ 300 million.i.e. at that time as per the regulation rate it 1530 /-crore There was a 38,000 /- crore benefit in just seven years and that too without planting one unit of electricity..??*
Congress is more destructive than our ability to think.
This was the government of 'world famous' economist', experienced and educated robbers!

More from Government

Canada is failing to act on Climate Change. @wef @WorldBank @IMFNews @IPCC_CH @UNDPGAIN @AntiCorruptIntl @Pontifex @JustinWelby @OCCRP @StopCorpAbuse @TaxJusticeNet @FairTaxCanada @ecojustice_ca @WCELaw @CanEnvLawAssn @envirodefence @IBA_Canada #cdnpoli


Covid recovery money is going to the oligarchy.

Ottawa and the provinces have put very little on the table to help clean-tech companies directly during Covid 19 while targeting fossil-fuel producers with more than $16 billion in aid.

Coast to coast people have demanded treaties be honored. We demanded climate action, divestment and land back but Canada is not listening. This video shows 10 years of rallies in Waterloo Ontario. City & regional council declared a climate emergency. 🚨

The Bank of China (BOC), SNC-Lavalin and WE Charity were recipients of taxpayer-funded the Covid 19 Canadian Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS)
Which metric is a better predictor of the severity of the fall surge in US states?

1) Margin of Democrat victory in Nov 2020 election
or
2) % infected through Sep 1, 2020

Can you guess which plot is which?


The left plot is based on the % infected through Sep 1, 2020. You can see that there is very little correlation with the % infected since Sep 1.

However, there is a *strong* correlation when using the margin of Biden's victory (right).

Infections % from
https://t.co/WcXlfxv3Ah.


This is the strongest single variable I've seen in being able to explain the severity of this most recent wave in each state.

Not past infections / existing immunity, population density, racial makeup, latitude / weather / humidity, etc.

But political lean.

One can argue that states that lean Democrat are more likely to implement restrictions/mandates.

This is valid, so we test this by using the Government Stringency Index made by @UniofOxford.

We also see a correlation, but it's weaker (R^2=0.36 vs 0.50).

https://t.co/BxBBKwW6ta


To avoid look-ahead bias/confounding variables, here is the same analysis but using 2016 margin of victory as the predictor. Similar results.

This basically says that 2016 election results is a better predictor of the severity of the fall wave than intervention levels in 2020!

You May Also Like