My interaction with @ETNOWlive earlier today on a variety of topics - Consumption, Healthcare, IPOs to name a view.
More from Sajal Kapoor
Never Knowingly Misguide.
Money making and fake advisory/PMS propaganda has never been my agenda
In just 15 years, #LaurusLabs has scaled up like no other..!
— Conviction | Patience (@unseenvalue) July 5, 2020
Numbers v Narrative: Well balanced 2800 Cr sales + huge competitive advantage in terms of IP/patents/synthesis capability!
Comparing Laurus with others - 1 hrs 28 mins\U0001f447https://t.co/Zzx6AwHZLH
Conviction | Patience pic.twitter.com/I6bImfjDCW
More from Genericlearnings
Here is the
Glad that many could guess/ know the candle stick pattern and mainly know how to use it.
— The Chartians (@chartians) July 24, 2021
The one shown in the image was bullish Harami
The word Harami comes from an old Japanese word meaning pregnant.. pic.twitter.com/4qBDCyY2Pq
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?