Categories For later read

7 days 30 days All time Recent Popular
Christians have known this was coming. But we must ask ourselves:
1. What is Satan's ultimate goal? His goal besides enslaving mankind, is to sit in God's temple on earth
Where is God's Temple on earth? Hint: It's not in Jerusalem.
2. How will he accomplish this goal?


We know that God has a temple in heaven by reading Revelation 11:19
And the temple of God was opened in heaven, and there was seen in his temple the ark of his testament: and there were lightnings, and voices, and thunderings, and an earthquake, and great hail.

And we know there is no temple in the New Heaven & earth Rev 21:22-23
I did not see a temple in the city, because the Lord God Almighty & the Lamb are its temple. The city does not need the sun or moon to shine on it, for the glory of God gives it light, and the Lamb is its lamp

So where is the Temple Satan wants to sit in?
1 Corinthians 3:16 tells us
“Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?”

So how does Satan sit in YOU? How does he control you? How does he accomplish controlling the whole world; every living human on this planet?
Posting this as a separate thread bc I have a few things to say ....

Note: There will be cursing.

1/x


First ...

It's well past "about time" that our Fed Gov't gets serious about the horror show that is #LTChomes care in Canada. We have been _warehousing_ our seniors & #PwD for DECADES, believing in the outright LIE that a public / private mix could work.

2/x

When the fuck have private - aka FOR PROFIT - models ever worked to address shortcomings in how we treat "minorities" in society? While Insurance™️ companies sold us the pipe-dream of Freedom55 (remeber that?), seniors that missed the boat got locked away.

3/x

There is NO WORLD in which charging ppl $5000 / mo for _shared_ accommodations in a run-down building, where "nutritious meals" are something we wouldn't normally serve a dog, and residents are _abused_ .... is acceptable. NONE. 🤬

4/x

Further, there is NO WORLD in which, arguably, the _most damaging_ Premier of ON in recent history, Mike Harris, should be trusted to have the "best intentions" of anyone but himself running amok in his blackened heart. That man is human trash 🤬

5/x
The reason this is all so brazen and so well documented is that these people literally did not see what they did as serious. They saw it as ‘civil disobedience’ at worst.

Why? Because they are White supremacists living in a white supremacist country.


In many parts of the country right now, law enforcement wouldn’t haven’t even pressed charges against them for any of this.

In fact, law enforcement were clearly among their ranks!

These 80%+ red counties are literal bastions of white supremacy.

But even as you move closer to the suburbs or even the cities, you still can get away with A LOT of this.

Lily white states from Maine to Iowa are places where white people feel entitled to do what they please, because this is THEIR country.

It’s a whole lot more convenient for a lot of people to act like these are Klansman from the Deep South, but the reality is, they are from every part of the country. If I had to guess, there are a lot more from up north than down south.

Because this is America.

Even today, while we are in the middle of a violent coup, the white legacy media barely ever mentions the term “white supremacy,” except when describing groups like the proud boys.

Because this is “divisive.”
I’m retweeting this one not because I agree with it, but because I want to emphasize that all of this is so speculative. What does the exclusion of the president’s inability to pardon in cases of impeachment mean?


Is it only limited when the president is impeached and removed? Clinton’s pardons were allowed to stand, after he was impeached by the House—but the impeachment cause was so trivial—& they were also unrelated to the causes of his impeachment.

I actually think that allowing Clinton to grant pardons after impeachment was a big mistake, one that went against the intention of the Constitution, & one that helped to create the current mess. But that narrow precedent stands. What about the longer history & larger question?

After impeachment, President Johnson gave at least two pardons but they were reversed by President Grant immediately afterwards. How many did he give once impeached? Can other historians pipe in?

The revised edition of Joseph Story’s textbook of constitutional interpretation, published in 1868, said that presidents cannot pardon after impeachment as such a power “might become ... a protection against political offenses...the party accused might be acting under ...”
FEEL THE HEAT! It's the August 2020 WrestleWipe thread!

Yes! Hello! Welcome! In this thread we'll be going through all the news, drama, bullshit and petty squabbles that made professional wrestling the HOT TOPIC on our timelines.

Please read on...

PLUGS:

My podcast reviewing old indie wrestling tournaments is now live! Listen, subscribe & relive the glory years of independent wrestling.

Hotdogs & Handshakes (@HotdogHandshake):
https://t.co/GOcKFZ84gd

Also, visit https://t.co/3Vo4UvzSAf for more recaps & reviews.

If you need a catch up, here's the July thread. You can also find it, and all the other montly recaps, on Wrestle Wipe dot


Couple of things before I get started;

1. Apologies in advance for any formatting errors. These are big, media-filled threads and the app I use to create them is still fairly new and in constant development.

2. As is most likely the case going forward with these threads, there will be some references to Speaking Out so please use this part as a trigger warning. It won't be as much as June or July, but just please bare that in mind when reading on.

Now let's get onto the thread!