The reason this is all so brazen and so well documented is that these people literally did not see what they did as serious. They saw it as ‘civil disobedience’ at worst.

Why? Because they are White supremacists living in a white supremacist country.

In many parts of the country right now, law enforcement wouldn’t haven’t even pressed charges against them for any of this.

In fact, law enforcement were clearly among their ranks!

These 80%+ red counties are literal bastions of white supremacy.
But even as you move closer to the suburbs or even the cities, you still can get away with A LOT of this.

Lily white states from Maine to Iowa are places where white people feel entitled to do what they please, because this is THEIR country.
It’s a whole lot more convenient for a lot of people to act like these are Klansman from the Deep South, but the reality is, they are from every part of the country. If I had to guess, there are a lot more from up north than down south.

Because this is America.
Even today, while we are in the middle of a violent coup, the white legacy media barely ever mentions the term “white supremacy,” except when describing groups like the proud boys.

Because this is “divisive.”
Instead they talk about “MAGA” or “Trump supporters” or as Chris Cuomo puts it, “Retrumplicans.”

They tell us they *they* are the problem now and the rest of us should unite against them in order to solve this problem.
Bullshit.

The GOPers who rejected Trump but voted for Susan Collins in Maine are just as much a part of the problem.

They too want to continue to live in White Supremacist America.

They just want a more peaceful version of it.
This was Tucker Carlson’s monologue the other night, and the future of much of the GOP.

Bring back peaceful white supremacy.
Much of white legacy media is on board with this.

Worse, much of white LEFTIST and LIBERAL media is also on board with this.

They want to maintain as much of the power structure as possible.
On the left, you have white leftists who demand we center economic issues over “Idpol,” because that keeps the power structure in place.

We have white liberals and white feminists and white gays, who push to keep their own identities central.
There is simply a massive, massive effort from many directions to keep *some form* of institutional white supremacy in place.

None of them want to see it fully dismantled. Just parts of it.
But the fact is, defeating white supremacy—all of it—must be our central focus right now above all else.

Yes, we must have a simultaneous policy focus on a myriad of issues.

But from a political science standpoint, there is ONE thing standing in the way of all of that.
No, it’s not “corporatism.”

It’s white supremacy.

More from For later read

How I created content in 2020

A thread...

Back in Aug 2016, I started creating content to share my experiences as an entrepreneur.
Over 3 years I had put out 1,200+ hours of content - posting every week without


Little did I know that something I started almost 4 years back would give my life an entirely new direction.

At the end of 2019, my biggest platform was LinkedIn with ~700K followers.

In Jan 2020, I decided to build a team that would help me with the content.

I ran a month long recruitment drive to hire a team of interns.

It comprised 4 detailed rounds - starting with my loved 20 questions, then an assignment, then a WhatsApp video round and finally F2F.

Through 1,200+ applications, I finally selected 6 profiles, starting March.

I am a firm believer in @peterthiel's one task, one person philosophy
So the team was structured such that everyone was responsible for ONLY one task

1. Content ideas
2. Videography
3. Video editing
4. LinkedIn (+TikTok) distribution
5. FB+IG distribution
6. YouTube distribution

You May Also Like

The UN just voted to condemn Israel 9 times, and the rest of the world 0.

View the resolutions and voting results here:

The resolution titled "The occupied Syrian Golan," which condemns Israel for "repressive measures" against Syrian citizens in the Golan Heights, was adopted by a vote of 151 - 2 - 14.

Israel and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/HoO7oz0dwr


The resolution titled "Israeli practices affecting the human rights of the Palestinian people..." was adopted by a vote of 153 - 6 - 9.

Australia, Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No' https://t.co/1Ntpi7Vqab


The resolution titled "Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and the occupied Syrian Golan" was adopted by a vote of 153 – 5 – 10.

Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/REumYgyRuF


The resolution titled "Applicability of the Geneva Convention... to the
Occupied Palestinian Territory..." was adopted by a vote of 154 - 5 - 8.

Canada, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and the U.S. voted 'No'
https://t.co/xDAeS9K1kW