i’ll keep saying this but for example look no further than the ku klux klan, theatrical and silly and also deadly serious

we often talk about the overthrow of reconstruction as a singular organized effort, but it should be understood as something more disparate and fractured, with success tied less to martial superiority than the indifference of authorities to intimidation and violence.
a group of guys — maybe the owner of the general store, and the sheriff and some farmers who fought in the war — gets together to gripe and complain and plot a little mischief. they put on masks and grab guns and go beat up a black sharecropper or local clerk or whatever...
everyone knows who did it. but there’s no one to stop them. the army, if it’s even in the state, is tens or hundreds of miles away. and mustering a militia may risk open conflict. the guys realize they can do this and getaway with it. so they do it again.
maybe they have a few more people with them this time. maybe they escalate, not just beating up local blacks and their white allies but killing a few.
and also, this is happening in other towns, and sympathetic newspapers are calling for men to march on the state capitol to take it back from “negro rule”
what begins as a series of larks turns, pretty quickly, into a real force with the ability to inflict real violence and threaten the state’s control on violence
for example: in the span of a year, 1874, the White League in Louisiana went from terrorizing local teachers to occupying the state house in New Orleans and deposing the governor
after a few days, federal troops arrived and the League stood down. but no one was prosecuted and members learned an important lesson: they could do it again. so they did, in 1876, securing victory for the democratic candidate for governor in the process.
like-minded people in other states took note, and formed paramilitaries of their own. “White-Line” Democrats in Mississippi formed paramilitaries that killed and terrorized their way to political power in 1875 and 1876. “Red shirts” in South Carolina did the same.
more people know about Wilmington 1898 these days, but supporters of the “white supremacy” campaign that formed the backdrop to the Wilmington coup were very aware of what transpired in Mississippi, Louisiana and South Carolina twenty years earlier.
as always, history isn’t a literal guide to the present; it can only give insight into the social forces that produce certain outcomes. and one important difference to take note of is that, in the late 1870s, an entire generation of men had direct experience in armed conflict.
having said that, we shouldn’t shrug off the fact that one of the participants in yesterday’s mob action was veterans of our forever wars. there were surely others. https://t.co/TXnnErXxQO
https://t.co/YFNIDJYPwI
oh, and one more thing: the men who led this violence didn’t just disappear. they became leaders. a few, even held office. and of that few, some even went to washington, like “Pitchfork” Ben Tillman
there’s a statue of Wade Hampton, the leader of the Red shirts, in the Capitol building right now
with enough impunity, distance and deliberate forgetting, mob leaders and insurrectionists can become statesmen. just an ending note for the “history will judge you” crowd.

happy thursday!

More from For later read

The common understanding of propaganda is that it is intended to brainwash the masses. Supposedly, people get exposed to the same message repeatedly and over time come to believe in whatever nonsense authoritarians want them to believe /1

And yet authoritarians often broadcast silly, unpersuasive propaganda.

Political scientist Haifeng Huang writes that the purpose of propaganda is not to brainwash people, but to instill fear in them /2


When people are bombarded with propaganda everywhere they look, they are reminded of the strength of the regime.

The vast amount of resources authoritarians spend to display their message in every corner of the public square is a costly demonstration of their power /3

In fact, the overt silliness of authoritarian propaganda is part of the point. Propaganda is designed to be silly so that people can instantly recognize it when they see it


Propaganda is intended to instill fear in people, not brainwash them.

The message is: You might not believe in pro-regime values or attitudes. But we will make sure you are too frightened to do anything about it.
Today's Twitter threads (a Twitter thread).

Inside: Planet Money on HP's myriad ripoffs; Strength in numbers; and more!

Archived at: https://t.co/esjoT3u5Gr

#Pluralistic

1/


On Feb 22, I'm delivering a keynote address for the NISO Plus conference, "The day of the comet: what trustbusting means for digital manipulation."

https://t.co/Z84xicXhGg

2/


Planet Money on HP's myriad ripoffs: Ink-stained wretches of the world, unite!

https://t.co/k5ASdVUrC2

3/


Strength in numbers: The crisis in accounting.

https://t.co/DjfAfHWpNN

4/


#15yrsago Bad Samaritan family won’t return found expensive camera https://t.co/Rn9E5R1gtV

#10yrsago What does Libyan revolution mean for https://t.co/Jz28qHVhrV? https://t.co/dN1e4MxU4r

5/

You May Also Like