ALIYU ABDULHAMEED, NIRSAL MANAGING DIRECTOR/CEO’S 5-YEAR SCORECARD: DECEMBER 2015 – SEPTEMBER 2020
Facilitated 510 billion worth of Economic Activity with over 515 000 direct jobs created across the agricultural value chain.
Thread.
·
· the adoption of optimized models and risk management tools by actors in agricultural value chains and agriculture finance;
· jobs created and sustained; and
· lives positively impacted.
In addition, Aliyu has shown a sharp business acumen and stewardship having grown NIRSAL’s balance sheet,
His achievements cut across the following key performance areas:
2. Facilitating Agricultural Insurance
3. Agricultural Value Chain Development
4. Guarantee Portfolio and Project Risk Management
5. Financial Growth and Stewardship
1) Facilitating Agribusiness Finance and Investments
Through innovative approaches and instruments aimed at eliminating risks associated with agriculture
2) Facilitating Agricultural Insurance
Under the leadership of Aliyu Abdulhameed, NIRSAL has moved the..
· Within two years of intervening in agricultural insurance, from 2017 to 2019,
3) Agricultural Value Chain Development
In the last 5 years, the Abdulhameed-led NIRSAL has excelled at
· Using satellite-based multispectral imaging,
NIRSAL demonstrates risk management acumen and builds trust by developing and deploying robust risk management tools and technologies.
NIRSAL performs comprehensive project monitoring of all supported projects as a critical risk management strategy leveraging
Building NIRSAL as a successful and sustainable organization..
· Coming out of the CBN with a team of three (3) core staff, NIRSAL is now fully manned with 255
· NIRSAL now operates from 40 physical offices across all the States of the Federation and the FCT.
6) Impact in Nigeria, Africa and the Globe
Under Abdulhameed’s leadership, NIRSAL has made commendable sustainable economic, social and..
· Estimated NGN510billion worth of economic activity generated;
· 515,000+ Direct Employment created/sustained;
· Facilitation of climate finance for agricultural value chain actors;
More from For later read
There is some valuable analysis in this report, but on the defense front this report is deeply flawed. There are other sections of value in report but, candidly, I don't think it helps us think through critical question of Taiwan defense issues in clear & well-grounded way. 1/
Normally as it might seem churlish to be so critical, but @cfr is so high-profile & the co-authors so distinguished I think it’s key to be clear. If not, people - including in Beijing - could get the wrong idea & this report could do real harm if influential on defense issues. 2/
BLUF: The defense discussion in this report does not engage at the depth needed to add to this critical debate. Accordingly conclusions in report are ill-founded - & in key parts harmful/misleading, esp that US shldnt be prepared defend Taiwan directly (alongside own efforts). 3/
The root of the problem is that report doesn't engage w the real debate on TWN defense issues or, frankly, the facts as knowable in public. Perhaps the most direct proof of this: The citations. There is nothing in the citations to @DeptofDefense China Military Power Report...4/
Nor to vast majority of leading informed sources on this like Ochmanek, the @RANDCorporation Scorecard, @CNAS, etc. This is esp salient b/c co-authors by their own admission have v little insight into contemporary military issues. & both last served in govt in Bush 43. 5/
This is an excellent report, and I'm glad to have joined the study group. The central focus on avoiding war is understandable--a US-China war would be catastrophic and should be avoided. But protecting Taiwan's security and prosperity requires doing more. 1/x https://t.co/P0Sg4LJcpV
— Bonnie Glaser / \u845b\u4f86\u5100 (@BonnieGlaser) February 12, 2021
Normally as it might seem churlish to be so critical, but @cfr is so high-profile & the co-authors so distinguished I think it’s key to be clear. If not, people - including in Beijing - could get the wrong idea & this report could do real harm if influential on defense issues. 2/
BLUF: The defense discussion in this report does not engage at the depth needed to add to this critical debate. Accordingly conclusions in report are ill-founded - & in key parts harmful/misleading, esp that US shldnt be prepared defend Taiwan directly (alongside own efforts). 3/
The root of the problem is that report doesn't engage w the real debate on TWN defense issues or, frankly, the facts as knowable in public. Perhaps the most direct proof of this: The citations. There is nothing in the citations to @DeptofDefense China Military Power Report...4/
Nor to vast majority of leading informed sources on this like Ochmanek, the @RANDCorporation Scorecard, @CNAS, etc. This is esp salient b/c co-authors by their own admission have v little insight into contemporary military issues. & both last served in govt in Bush 43. 5/
You May Also Like
H was always unseen in S2NL :)
Those who exited at 1500 needed money. They can always come back near 969. Those who exited at 230 also needed money. They can come back near 95.
Those who sold L @ 660 can always come back at 360. Those who sold S last week can be back @ 301
Those who exited at 1500 needed money. They can always come back near 969. Those who exited at 230 also needed money. They can come back near 95.
Those who sold L @ 660 can always come back at 360. Those who sold S last week can be back @ 301
Sir, Log yahan.. 13 days patience nhi rakh sakte aur aap 2013 ki baat kar rahe ho. Even Aap Ready made portfolio banakar bhi de do to bhi wo 1 month me hi EXIT kar denge \U0001f602
— BhavinKhengarSuratGujarat (@IntradayWithBRK) September 19, 2021
Neuland 2700 se 1500 & Sequent 330 to 230 kya huwa.. 99% retailers/investors twitter par charcha n EXIT\U0001f602
