This is so true! I imagine everyone accumulates a story that serves to make this point, but I'm afraid I can't resist sharing mine... 1/

Once, long ago, my manager came to me on a Friday afternoon: "Are you going to be here on Monday?" 2/
Now, this is the 1990s: to work from home, you needed a modem (!!) -- and at the time, I owned no computer so even that wasn't happening. So I was emphatically going to be there on Monday, if for no other reason that I had nowhere else to work. 3/
"Yes, of course I'm going to be here on Monday."
"Okay, we need to talk Monday."
"Is there something wrong? Can we talk now?"
"Let's talk Monday." 4/
My early-twentysomething self was (obviously?) very anxious, so I immediately went to the office of the senior engineer in the group (and my mentor), Jeff Bonwick to see if he knew of anything that I might have screwed up... 5/
Somewhat to my surprise, he was less interested in brainstorming ways in which I might be in trouble -- and much more dismayed at the clumsiness of our manager. "Wait here." He left. 6/
I heard him enter our manager's office several doors down. The walls were thin. I could hear that Bonwick was... emphatic. He was there for a few minutes, and returned: "Now go back to your office." 7/
I went back to my office, and my manager appeared, sheepishly. "Do you, um, have a second to talk now?" Of course I did! 8/
And as it turns out, it was... nothing. It was not that I had even upset anyone (which, um, happened), it was that he needed to ask me a purely technical question. He didn't want to ask me on Friday afternoon because he wanted to start his own weekend early! 9/
It highlighted a couple of things: first, never, ever do this. Do not ruin someone's weekend (or their evening or their morning) letting their minds run wild. If you need to telegraph a meeting like this (which you generally shouldn't!), ALWAYS provide enough context. 10/
This is especially important with engineers who, as worst-case thinkers by nature, are much more likely to run to worst-case outcomes! (And indeed, the best ones are most likely to be most creative this regard!) 11/
So if it's good news, TELL THEM. "Hey, let me know when you have a second; I've got some good news." (It will come as no surprise that those calls get returned very quickly!) 12/
If it's not bad news but rather just a needed conversation on some issue there should be -- as per Seth's comment and the blog entry that it references -- complete context. 13/
If it IS bad news, there should be no telegraphing it, ever: it should be done in person (or over video) -- especially if it's the exceptionally bad news. (Even when "it shouldn't be surprising", this news is always shocking at some level; telegraphing it doesn't help.) 14/
In my case, I was protected by a senior engineer who was willing to act as an advocate, saving me from the mediocre atrocities of poor management. I am deeply grateful for this, and have tried myself to be that senior engineer for others over my career. 15/
Empathy in communication is essential! Always communicate to others the way you yourself would want to be communicated with -- and if in a leadership position, you must be especially mindful of the extra weight that your words (or lack of them!) carry! 16/16

More from For later read

You May Also Like

@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the


chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project

starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".

P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!

https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?