I sense a few double standards present in the debate over Bidens’ historic Child Tax Credit proposal that would cut the child poverty rate by more than 40%.

My focus here is on a perhaps less obvious one but I think relevant: trust fund kids & the tax treatment of inheritances

Since the mid-1990s, as I’ll walk through, reducing the taxation of large inheritances has been a top, if not the top, tax policy priority of conservatives and Republicans.
In parallel, as I’ll also walk through, there has been a steady stream of research concluding that large inheritances reduce the work effort of wealthy heirs
Unless I’ve missed it, I’ve not sensed the type of concern about the work effects on wealthy heirs among conservative proponents of large tax-free inheritances, which we now see among some conservatives and Republican lawmakers around poor people and a larger Child Tax Credit
In 1997, as part of an agreement with Clinton, who secured wins to make health care more affordable for poor children and college tax credits, Gingrich won “reductions in capital gains and estate taxes that had been principal goals for the GOP.”
https://t.co/2dbjAW1pUA
Before fast-forwarding to the 2001 Bush Tax Cut, a side note that the 1997 Clinton-Gingrich deal included the introduction of a $500 Child Tax Credit, and in which Gingrich strongly resisted including low-income children.
A key pillar of the 2001 Bush tax cut was the elimination of the estate tax, a windfall for the wealthiest heirs in the country. For Senate procedural reasons, the elimination was not made permanent and a weakened estate tax returned ten years later
https://t.co/yW210XtBFE
In 2012, during the Biden-McConnell fiscal cliff negotiation, Biden secured a temporary extension of having the child tax credit flow to more low-income families and in return McConnell secured a permanent $10 million per couple estate tax exemption
https://t.co/HaKhd0NZjv
Then in 2017, the Trump tax cut raised the amount that wealthy parents could bequeath tax-free to $22 million. This large exemption, combined with gaping loopholes, means that wealthy heirs can inherit massive sums tax-free. Heirs do not pay income tax on these windfalls.
Before turning to the research on work, note that over half of the money flowing from the largest estates to heirs is in the form of unrealized gains which have never been taxed.
Before and during this period while conservatives and Republicans were pushing to increase the amounts wealthy heirs could inherit tax-free, there was a steady stream of research on the work effects of such inheritances
Here’s a 1992 paper from Holtz-Eakin, Joulfaian, & Rosen which concludes: “The results are consistent with Andrew Carnegie's century-old assertion that large inheritances decrease a person's labor force participation.”
https://t.co/3quHxvySnQ
Here is another from economist David Joulfaian from 2006 which concludes that “large inheritances are found to depress labor force participation.”
https://t.co/EcOri1K9UP
In this report from 2009, @dashching, @gillian_brunet, and I sum up some of these conclusions and have links to various papers.
https://t.co/sRrqQaYDF1
@mcottle 1997: “If anything, passing along large estates..increases the likelihood that a person’s heirs will never have to work hard..Is this any way to foster the Republicans’ much-touted work ethic? Or does that particular virtue apply only to the poor?”https://t.co/OVEfngFBJw
As the child tax credit debate progresses, and there is intense focus on the behaviors of people who have little money, I think it’s healthy to step back and ask what types of double standards are being applied – perhaps like one with wealthy heirs

End

More from Finance

THREAD: Who are the rising stars of Chinese elite politics in the central Party-State bureaucracy?

For @MacroPoloChina I analyzed last year's ministerial-level promotions to posts in Beijing

TLDR: Ties to Xi Jinping—or a Xi ally—are very helpful! (1/14)

https://t.co/kO2A0Efyq2


Seven politicians were promoted to ministerial-level positions in central Party agencies last year

All are likely to feature on the next Central Committee selected at the 2022 Party Congress

Some could make the CCP's elite 25-person Politburo (2/14)

https://t.co/kO2A0Efyq2


Likeliest for the Politburo is Meng Xiangfeng, new Executive Deputy Director of the CCP General Office

He would replace Xi ally Ding Xuexiang as CCP chief-of-staff if Ding is promoted further in 2022

Meng worked under Xi allies Cai Qi in Hangzhou and Chen Xi in Liaoning (3/14)


Less likely for the Politburo but still important is Jiang Jinquan, new Director of the CCP Policy Research Office

He replaces 5th-ranked leader Wang Huning who led the Party's brains trust for 18 years

Wang remains prominent and will be <68 in 2022, so he'll stay around (4/14)


Other notable central Party promotions include Li Shulei and Liang Yanshun, who both assisted Xi when he led the Central Party School from 2007-2012

Li is a political conservative who is said to be quite close with Xi, even drafting his 2014 speech on culture and art (5/14)

You May Also Like