Clearly, anyone who thinks school closures are doing great harm to children is just playing politics. That's why publications on the right, such as NPR, the Washington Post, the New York Times, the New Yorker, The Atlantic, and CBS News have all chimed in to support it.
https://t.co/M8oW34J3i7
https://t.co/VuY4VbkizN
More from Education
Our top 15 tweets
A #prodmgmt thread 👇
https://t.co/Yv854Sd3P3
https://t.co/sXaMH1bZ9m
https://t.co/5X7bOTsS7m
https://t.co/w1y6LTtPS2
A #prodmgmt thread 👇
https://t.co/Yv854Sd3P3
Sum up Product Management in 4 words or less. \U0001f609
— Product School (@productschool) April 10, 2020
https://t.co/sXaMH1bZ9m
\u201cWithout data, you\u2019re just another person with an opinion.\u201d
— Product School (@productschool) July 22, 2020
-W. Edwards Deming
https://t.co/5X7bOTsS7m
MVP (Minimum Viable Product) or MLP (Minimum Lovable Product)? \u2764\ufe0f
— Product School (@productschool) July 6, 2020
https://t.co/w1y6LTtPS2
UI/UX are not just add-ons for a product. They\u2019re critical elements that need care, research, and a Product Manager\u2019s full attention.
— Product School (@productschool) July 12, 2020
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?