On teaching without grades.
A long-ish (20-tweet) đŸ§”. Here goes.

So, you know how you write lots of comments on an essay/exam, and the student looks at the grade and never reads the comments? That's because when grades enter the picture, the learning stops. /1

Instead of focusing on learning, there is a lot of negotiation: can we find one or two points on the midterm as the student is just on the verge of A-?

Everyone is just on the verge of the next grade.

And all the evals are not about the class but about the grading. Really? /2
Is the grade at all informative? If you are just below the A- or just above that, is that giving the student any information about how to improve their knowledge or skills? No. t is just a useless, demoralizing & stressful smoke screen /3
Students' abilities, challenges, and learning are multidimensional. Providing feedback on these many dimensions is much more useful for promoting growth and learning than are quantized unidimensional grades. /3.5
There is an alternative: do away with grades. Keep the feedback -- lots of it (this is not less work for us teachers) but never summarize it in a unidimensional uninformative number (unless you absolutely have to). /4
There is research to support this: "Why grade? To give students feedback, a professor might say. To measure learning. To motivate.

Here’s the problem: Decades of research undercuts these assumptions." (starting from Ruth Butler in the 80's at Hebrew U.)/5
https://t.co/y0WZ218QMm
Here is where I learned all about this, from Starr Sackstein who is one of the founders of "Teachers Throwing out Grades" (#TToG), interviewed for Cult of Pedagogy. Well worth a listen. Also look up #ungrading.
/6

https://t.co/tKrygx1Mix
(oh, and https://t.co/NJJ1RK014S has many other gems; check out https://t.co/z7oEsuL67S) /6.5
My specific implementation is 2 semesters old, and I love it so far:
1. Tell students in advance why you are doing this. Get buy-in. I basically tell them all the above.
2. Get them to focus on what they want to get out of this course, rather than what grade I'll give them. /7
Have them set themselves S.M.A.R.T goals with a dedicated worksheet. They track their goals on that sheet throughout the semester. I comment on the goals, and meet with them to discuss progress a couple of times during the semester. This is a living doc that can change. /8
In a freshman course, I had them focus the goals on skills, in an advanced course, goals had to touch on each of the course components. When COVID-19 hit, we revised goals to adjust to circumstances, and added a personal wellness goal. Here is a template. https://t.co/vQ8NYtikEw
Their goals were uniformly thoughtful. Some very detailed, some setting too high a bar (I talked them down), some not fully aligned with the course material (a good chance to adjust expectations).

Importantly it puts the responsibility on them: what do YOU want to learn here?/10
Then teach with a lot of feedback. If students presented they got feedback from me and from colleagues. Paper drafts were due early and everyone got peer reviews. Make sure there are chances to act on feedback and improve (>1 presentation; unlimited makeups on papers) /11
Students loved it. They thrived. The learning outcomes were amazing, and they learned to see their learning differently -- as a process, not a goal. And throughout we were on the same side: I and the student both have the goal of helping them achieve their goals. /12
Also, I planned course components thinking about skills they can learn: group work, group research projects, class presentations, reading prompts, writing an op ed. No busy work. If a course component doesn't clearly serve their growth, why should they do it? /13
In the second course, I also added the method of specs grading -- they can choose components to apply themselves to, and are free to choose to drop things. See attached syllabus (it is long -- part of my syllabus review towards decolonizing the classroom) https://t.co/DQU7fil4TI
At the end of the course we met to talk about their final grade. I came with an idea, and asked them to suggest a grade and explain why (with data!). In most cases we agreed or I suggested higher than they did. In a couple they convinced me up. In one I stood my ground down. /15
No one slacked off throughout the semester, and I felt they were all there all the time. Fewer late assignments than when I had a penalty for lateness... even though there was no grade and no penalty! Nothing beats intrinsic motivation. They did it because they wanted to. /16
I enjoyed this way of teaching much more. I think students learned much more. They will take some of this to other courses. Like one student said "you gave us the skills without the pressure. This was the first course I took that made space for personal development." /17
That is why we teach. If I can help it, I am never going back to grades.

But I have a lot more to learn about this method. I am sure it will only get better.

ps. Of course having the right TA was critical. Thank you, @sashankpisupati! This was so fun to do together!

/fin

More from Education

Time for some thoughts on schools given the revised SickKids document and the fact that ON decided to leave most schools closed. ON is not the only jurisdiction to do so, but important to note that many jurisdictions would not have done so -even with higher incidence rates.


As outlined in the tweet by @NishaOttawa yesterday, the situation is complex, and not a simple right or wrong https://t.co/DO0v3j9wzr. And no one needs to list all the potential risks and downsides of prolonged school closures.


On the other hand: while school closures do not directly protect our most vulnerable in long-term care at all, one cannot deny that any factor potentially increasing community transmission may have an indirect effect on the risk to these institutions, and on healthcare.

The question is: to what extend do schools contribute to transmission, and how to balance this against the risk of prolonged school closures. The leaked data from yesterday shows a mixed picture -schools are neither unicorns (ie COVID free) nor infernos.

Assuming this data is largely correct -while waiting for an official publication of the data, it shows first and foremost the known high case numbers at Thorncliff, while other schools had been doing very well -are safe- reiterating the impact of socioeconomics on the COVID risk.
@KaylaAncrum 1) This reminds me of junior high back in the Chicago suburbs when some classmates pretended my name was ‘too hard’ & relentlessly teased me as ‘Shoehead,’ ‘Shitvo,’ & ‘Shamu’ for almost 2 years until my social studies teacher Mr. C decided to absolutely GO OFF on them:

2) In class one day, to everyone’s utter astonishment, he stopped his lecture & said ‘I think some of you are having trouble pronouncing Shuvo’s name. It’s easy to say shoo-VOH, but your behaviour inspires me to give you new names now. Let’s point out a few examples.’

3) Mr. C turned to a red-haired jerk who often led the bullying and said ‘If you don’t shape up, you’ll be known as Carrot Head in my class, since you’re uglier than Carrot Top and you’re certainly bigheaded and arrogant.’

His face turned redder than his hair.

4) He then then turned to a classmate named Edie & said to her ‘I won’t call you Edie anymore, I’ll call you Dedie, as in DD, since that’s the grade you get in my class & it’s short for Dum-Dum, which is what you proved to be.’

I actually felt bad for her she was so mortified.

5) Then he turned to another kid whose last name was McCracken & said ‘You will be known as McChicken, since you’re a coward, & based on your performance it seems the most you can ever aspire to be is a fast food server, so wipe that smug grin off your face, cluck cluck.’

!!

You May Also Like

I’m torn on how to approach the idea of luck. I’m the first to admit that I am one of the luckiest people on the planet. To be born into a prosperous American family in 1960 with smart parents is to start life on third base. The odds against my very existence are astronomical.


I’ve always felt that the luckiest people I know had a talent for recognizing circumstances, not of their own making, that were conducive to a favorable outcome and their ability to quickly take advantage of them.

In other words, dumb luck was just that, it required no awareness on the person’s part, whereas “smart” luck involved awareness followed by action before the circumstances changed.

So, was I “lucky” to be born when I was—nothing I had any control over—and that I came of age just as huge databases and computers were advancing to the point where I could use those tools to write “What Works on Wall Street?” Absolutely.

Was I lucky to start my stock market investments near the peak of interest rates which allowed me to spend the majority of my adult life in a falling rate environment? Yup.
This is NONSENSE. The people who take photos with their books on instagram are known to be voracious readers who graciously take time to review books and recommend them to their followers. Part of their medium is to take elaborate, beautiful photos of books. Die mad, Guardian.


THEY DO READ THEM, YOU JUDGY, RACOON-PICKED TRASH BIN


If you come for Bookstagram, i will fight you.

In appreciation, here are some of my favourite bookstagrams of my books: (photos by lit_nerd37, mybookacademy, bookswrotemystory, and scorpio_books)